yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #78159
[Bug 1826066] [NEW] Iptables rules for unbound ports removed during agent sync
Public bug reported:
Hi.
Using Octavia and Neutron DVR-HA scheme looks like got a problem with
iptables rules in SNAT namespaces. During initial create Octavia LBaaS,
there is also creating such iptables forward rules:
# ip netns exec snat-7fd10a01-bf15-4603-81d5-d94412b007ab iptables -A neutron-vpn-agen-OUTPUT -d fip-ip -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.0.20 -t nat
# ip netns exec snat-7fd10a01-bf15-4603-81d5-d94412b007ab iptables -A neutron-vpn-agen-PREROUTING -d fip-ip -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.0.20 -t nat
And traffic goes well, but after full resync l3 agent on the network
node, this rules are disappears from namespaces and never goes back,
until recreated manually. After creating this rule in router namespaces,
the traffic goes well.
After short investigation of this issue, looks like something missed in
creating rules for unbound neutron ports.
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1826066
Title:
Iptables rules for unbound ports removed during agent sync
Status in neutron:
New
Bug description:
Hi.
Using Octavia and Neutron DVR-HA scheme looks like got a problem with
iptables rules in SNAT namespaces. During initial create Octavia
LBaaS, there is also creating such iptables forward rules:
# ip netns exec snat-7fd10a01-bf15-4603-81d5-d94412b007ab iptables -A neutron-vpn-agen-OUTPUT -d fip-ip -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.0.20 -t nat
# ip netns exec snat-7fd10a01-bf15-4603-81d5-d94412b007ab iptables -A neutron-vpn-agen-PREROUTING -d fip-ip -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.0.20 -t nat
And traffic goes well, but after full resync l3 agent on the network
node, this rules are disappears from namespaces and never goes back,
until recreated manually. After creating this rule in router
namespaces, the traffic goes well.
After short investigation of this issue, looks like something missed
in creating rules for unbound neutron ports.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1826066/+subscriptions
Follow ups