yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #79192
[Bug 1824566] Re: DVR-Nexthop static routes are not getting configured in FIP Namespace when disassociating and reassociating a FloatingIP in Ocata
** Changed in: neutron
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824566
Title:
DVR-Nexthop static routes are not getting configured in FIP Namespace
when disassociating and reassociating a FloatingIP in Ocata
Status in neutron:
Fix Released
Bug description:
Nexthop static routes for external network are not getting configured in the FIP Namespace table, after disassociating and re-associating a FloatingIP.
This is seen in Ocata and Newton. Not seen in Pike and later branches.
Steps to reproduce this problem.
1. Deploy the devstack cloud with DVR routers
2. Create a VM
3. Assign a FloatingIP to the VM.
4. Now configure a Nexthop static route for the external Network.
5. Make sure the Nexthop routes are seen in the SNAT Namespace and in the FIP Namespace under router specific lookup table-id.
6. Now Disassociate the floatingIP.
7. Make sure that the Nexthop routes are cleared from the FIP Namespace if this the only FloatingIP, under the router specific lookup table-id.
8. Now re-associate the FloatingIP.
9. Now you will see the 'Nexthop static routes' will be missing in the FIP Namespaces router specific lookup table-id.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1824566/+subscriptions
References