yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #81085
[Bug 1846535] Re: cloud-init 19.2.36 fails with python exception "Not all expected physical devices present ..." during bionic image deployment from MAAS
This bug is believed to be fixed in cloud-init in version 19.2-55. If
this is still a problem for you, please make a comment and set the state
back to New
Thank you.
** Changed in: cloud-init
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846535
Title:
cloud-init 19.2.36 fails with python exception "Not all expected
physical devices present ..." during bionic image deployment from
MAAS
Status in cloud-init:
Fix Released
Status in cloud-init package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in cloud-init source package in Xenial:
Fix Released
Status in cloud-init source package in Bionic:
Fix Released
Status in cloud-init source package in Disco:
Fix Released
Status in cloud-init source package in Eoan:
Fix Released
Bug description:
[Impact]
Any instances launched with bridges or bonds in their network
configuration will fail to bring up networking.
[Test Case]
# Juju bootstrap on maas of a machine sets up a network bridge that triggers a failure in cloud-init init stage.
# This results in a maas machine deployment failure and the machine gets released
Procedure:
# Alternate steps on a maas machine with a bridge already created
A1. confirm a bridge interface is configured for the target machine on interface eno1, name it broam, attach it to a subnet and select auto-assign for IP
A2. click deploy -> bionic
A3. Once manual deployment fails go to step 2 below
# Alternative 2 juju bootstrap failure on maas
B1: juju bootrap mymaas --no-gui
B2: Once bootstrap fails go to step 2
2. After deployment failure and machine is powered off click on the failed/released node in the MAAS UI
3. Click Rescue Mode from the 'Take Action' drop down in the MAAS UI
4. Grab the IP from the interfaces tab
5. ssh ubuntu@<theRescueMachineIP> -- cloud-init status --long
# Expect failure message
6. Click Exit Rescue Mode on the node in MAAS UI.
7. ssh to the maas server add the following lines to
/etc/maas/preseeds/curtin_userdata to test official *-proposed
packages:
system_upgrade: {enabled: True}
apt:
sources:
proposed.list:
source: deb $MIRROR $RELEASE-proposed main universe # upstream -proposed
8. Repeat step 1 and expect bootstrap success
# expect to see MAASDatasource from bootstrapped machine and no errors
9. juju ssh 0 -- cloud-init status --long
Additional verification checks to avoid regression
- DONE oracle
- DONE ec2
- DONE openstack
- DONE gce
- DONE azure
- DONE nocloud kvm
- DONE nocloud lxd
[Regression Potential]
The change being SRU'd adds more conditions to an existing
conditional. There is potential to regress the cases that the
existing conditional was introduced to cover, so we will be testing
those specifically. Other than that, there was some minor refactoring
of the existing conditional statement (which did not change the logic
it checks), which could cause issues for Oracle netfailover
interfaces. We will also specifically test on Oracle.
[Original Report]
Symptoms
========
After deployment of Ubuntu Bionic image on MAAS provider (deploying to
a bare metal server) juju cannot access any deployed machine due to
missing SSH keys and machines are stuck in pending state:
$ juju ssh 0
ERROR retrieving SSH host keys for "0": keys not found
$ juju machines
Machine State DNS Inst id Series AZ Message
0 pending 172.20.10.125 block-3 bionic AZ3 Deployed
1 pending 172.20.10.124 block-2 bionic AZ2 Deployed
2 pending 172.20.10.126 block-1 bionic AZ1 Deployed
3 pending 172.20.10.127 object-2 bionic AZ1 Deployed
4 pending 172.20.10.128 object-1 bionic AZ2 Deployed
5 pending 172.20.10.129 object-3 bionic AZ3 Deployed
It worth mentioning that pods can be successfully deployed with MAAS,
only bare metal deployment fails.
We checked different bionic images: cloud-init 19.2.24 works, and
cloud-init 19.2.36 doesn't.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1846535/+subscriptions
References