yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive

[hamza <1873091@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

the Neutron port dns_assignment dont match the designate DNS records
assigned to the Neutron port

as explained in the link below 
https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/pike/admin/config-dns-int.html

when a user creates a neutron port using the command below
neutron port-create 37aaff3a-6047-45ac-bf4f-a825e56fd2b3 \
  --dns-name my-vm --dns_domain port-domain.org.

The actual output for dns_assignment is:
{"hostname": "my-vm", "ip_address": "203.0.113.9", "fqdn": "my-vm.example.org."}
{"hostname": "my-vm", "ip_address": "2001:db8:10::9", "fqdn": "my-vm.example.org."}

and the Designate DNS records is 
67a8e83d-7e3c-4fb1-9261-0481318bb7b5 | A    | my-vm.port-domain.org.  | 203.0.113.9  
5a4f671c-9969-47aa-82e1-e05754021852 | AAAA | my-vm.port-domain.org.  | 2001:db8:10::9 

while the expected output for dns-assignment:
{"hostname": "my-vm", "ip_address": "203.0.113.9", "fqdn": "my-vm.port-domain.org."}
{"hostname": "my-vm", "ip_address": "2001:db8:10::9", "fqdn": "my-vm.port-domain.org."}


most likely right now the dns_domain is taken from the Neutron network dns_domain or from neutron dns_domain configuration


A good approach would be to always make the dns_assignment for Neutron port synced with the Designate DNS records if Designate is used

** Affects: neutron
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New


** Tags: rfe

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873091

Title:
  Neutron ports dns_assignment does not match the designate DNS records
  for Neutron port

Status in neutron:
  New

Bug description:
  the Neutron port dns_assignment dont match the designate DNS records
  assigned to the Neutron port

  as explained in the link below 
  https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/pike/admin/config-dns-int.html

  when a user creates a neutron port using the command below
  neutron port-create 37aaff3a-6047-45ac-bf4f-a825e56fd2b3 \
    --dns-name my-vm --dns_domain port-domain.org.

  The actual output for dns_assignment is:
  {"hostname": "my-vm", "ip_address": "203.0.113.9", "fqdn": "my-vm.example.org."}
  {"hostname": "my-vm", "ip_address": "2001:db8:10::9", "fqdn": "my-vm.example.org."}

  and the Designate DNS records is 
  67a8e83d-7e3c-4fb1-9261-0481318bb7b5 | A    | my-vm.port-domain.org.  | 203.0.113.9  
  5a4f671c-9969-47aa-82e1-e05754021852 | AAAA | my-vm.port-domain.org.  | 2001:db8:10::9 

  while the expected output for dns-assignment:
  {"hostname": "my-vm", "ip_address": "203.0.113.9", "fqdn": "my-vm.port-domain.org."}
  {"hostname": "my-vm", "ip_address": "2001:db8:10::9", "fqdn": "my-vm.port-domain.org."}

  
  most likely right now the dns_domain is taken from the Neutron network dns_domain or from neutron dns_domain configuration

  
  A good approach would be to always make the dns_assignment for Neutron port synced with the Designate DNS records if Designate is used

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1873091/+subscriptions