← Back to team overview

yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive

[Bug 1875439] Re: glance requires md5 implementation be available

 

Given this is only being fixed in master, and is also not in itself a
vulnerability, I don't think we'll need a formal security advisory and
CVE assignment. This is probably most accurately classified as a
security hardening opportunity (report class D in the VMT's taxonomy):
https://security.openstack.org/vmt-process.html#incident-report-taxonomy

** Also affects: ossa
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Changed in: ossa
       Status: New => Won't Fix

** Information type changed from Public Security to Public

** Tags added: security

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to Glance.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875439

Title:
  glance requires md5 implementation be available

Status in Glance:
  New
Status in OpenStack Security Advisory:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  Glance populates a legacy 'checksum' image property which is an md5
  hash of image data content.  It's a "legacy" property because it has
  not been required for the validation of downloaded image data since
  glance version 17.0.0 (Rocky) when the operator-configurable secure
  "multihash" was implemented.  However, the 'checksum' property has
  continued to be populated for backward compatibility.  In order to
  populate the field, even as a courtesy, an implementation of the md5
  algorithm must be available to glance; but this cannot be guaranteed
  in environments that comply with various security standards (for
  example, FIPS).  As a result, there are environments in which glance
  cannot be run, and of course, these are most likely exactly the
  environments in which people want to run glance.

  To remove the dependency on the insecure MD5 algorithm, glance should
  stop populating the legacy 'checksum' field.  It has already been made
  redundant by the secure "multihash" and is unnecessary.  In order to
  preserve backward compatibility, the field will not be removed.

  As a timeframe for fixing this: an announcement can be made to
  operators as part of the Ussuri release, and code using md5 will be
  removed during the Victoria development cycle.  Thus the Victoria
  release will not require Glance to be executed in a non-compliant
  security environment.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1875439/+subscriptions


References