yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #87901
[Bug 1954763] [NEW] Creating ports in bulks can be very slow due to many IPAM module conflicts
Public bug reported:
When ports are created in bulk, ML2 plugin tries to do everything for all ports in one single DB transaction. That means, that if IP allocation for one of the IPs will fail, whole create_port_bulk method will be retried so it will retry to do everything for all ports.
That may be very inefficient in some use cases, where many ports in bulk are created in same network.
I did simple test:
- create 2 networks with /24 subnet in each network,
- run 24 API requests to create 10 ports in bulk in each request - so in total 240 IPs from subnet will be allocated. All those requests were done in parallel.
- wait how long it will take to have all ports created.
I run my reproducer script 10 times as ipam module is working in some kind of random way so results may be different in various runs.
Results of that simple test are below:
Run Execution time
1 00:01:37
2 00:02:06
3 00:02:08
4 00:02:14
5 00:01:58
6 00:02:37
7 00:01:59
8 00:02:01
9 00:02:39
10 00:01:59
AVG 00:02:07
The execution time here is in fact time of the execution of the longest
API request (all of them started together). So there was many retries
done internally in Neutron to allocate IP addresses for those ports and
client had to wait sometimes more than 150 seconds to get reply for
request.
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Slawek Kaplonski (slaweq)
Status: Confirmed
** Tags: api l3-ipam-dhcp loadimpact ml2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954763
Title:
Creating ports in bulks can be very slow due to many IPAM module
conflicts
Status in neutron:
Confirmed
Bug description:
When ports are created in bulk, ML2 plugin tries to do everything for all ports in one single DB transaction. That means, that if IP allocation for one of the IPs will fail, whole create_port_bulk method will be retried so it will retry to do everything for all ports.
That may be very inefficient in some use cases, where many ports in bulk are created in same network.
I did simple test:
- create 2 networks with /24 subnet in each network,
- run 24 API requests to create 10 ports in bulk in each request - so in total 240 IPs from subnet will be allocated. All those requests were done in parallel.
- wait how long it will take to have all ports created.
I run my reproducer script 10 times as ipam module is working in some kind of random way so results may be different in various runs.
Results of that simple test are below:
Run Execution time
1 00:01:37
2 00:02:06
3 00:02:08
4 00:02:14
5 00:01:58
6 00:02:37
7 00:01:59
8 00:02:01
9 00:02:39
10 00:01:59
AVG 00:02:07
The execution time here is in fact time of the execution of the
longest API request (all of them started together). So there was many
retries done internally in Neutron to allocate IP addresses for those
ports and client had to wait sometimes more than 150 seconds to get
reply for request.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1954763/+subscriptions
Follow ups