yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #88152
[Bug 1939733] Re: [OSSA-2021-005] Arbitrary dnsmasq reconfiguration via extra_dhcp_opts (CVE-2021-40085)
Ubuntu CVE tracker: https://ubuntu.com/security/cve-2021-40085
** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939733
Title:
[OSSA-2021-005] Arbitrary dnsmasq reconfiguration via extra_dhcp_opts
(CVE-2021-40085)
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive:
New
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive queens series:
Fix Committed
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive rocky series:
Fix Committed
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive stein series:
Fix Committed
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive train series:
Fix Committed
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive ussuri series:
Fix Committed
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive victoria series:
Fix Committed
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive wallaby series:
Fix Committed
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive xena series:
New
Status in neutron:
Fix Released
Status in OpenStack Security Advisory:
Fix Released
Status in neutron package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in neutron source package in Bionic:
New
Status in neutron source package in Focal:
Fix Released
Status in neutron source package in Hirsute:
Won't Fix
Status in neutron source package in Impish:
Fix Released
Bug description:
Application doesnt check the input values for extra_dhcp_opts port
parameter allowing user to use a newline character. The values from
extra_dhcp_opts are used in rendering of opts file which is passed to
dnsmasq as a dhcp-optsfile. Considering this, an attacker can inject
any options to that file.
The main direct impact in my opinion is that attacker can push
arbitrary dhcp options to another instances connected to the same
network. And due to we are able to modify our own port connected to
external network, it is possible to push dhcp options to the instances
of another tennants using the same external network.
If we go further, there is an known buffer overflow vulnerability in
dnsmasq
(https://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commitdiff;h=7d04e17444793a840f98a0283968b96502b112dc)
which was not considered as a security issue due to attacker cannot
control dhcp opts in most cases and therefore this vulnerability is
still exists in most distributives (e.g Ubuntu 20.04.1). In our case
dhcp opts is exactly what attacker can modify, so we can trigger
buffer overflow there. I even managed to write an exploit which lead
to a remote code execution using this buffer overflow vulnerability.
Here the payload to crash dnsmasq as a proof of concept:
```
PUT /v2.0/ports/9db67e0f-537c-494a-a655-c8a0c518d57e HTTP/1.1
Host: openstack
X-Auth-Token: TOKEN
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 170
{"port":{
"extra_dhcp_opts":[{"opt_name":"zzz",
"opt_value":"xxx\n128,aa:bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb\n120,aa.cc\n128,:"
}]}}
```
Tested on ocata, train and victoria versions.
Vulnerability was found by Pavel Toporkov
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1939733/+subscriptions