yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #94746
[Bug 1775736] Re: misleading documentation of filesystem_store_metadata_file config opt
Looking at #1 I think the only issue left was the description of the
option in glance_store, which was fixed in #2. I'll close this bug then.
** Changed in: glance
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to Glance.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1775736
Title:
misleading documentation of filesystem_store_metadata_file config opt
Status in Glance:
Fix Released
Status in glance_store:
Fix Released
Bug description:
In glance:
The short discussion of the filesystem_store_metadata_file option in
doc/source/admin/manage-images.rst is misleading on two counts:
(1) It makes it sound like the location metadata is dynamically pulled
from the file and returned in the image-show response for any image.
In fact, the way this works is that glance will use the info in the
file when it writes the image location--so you will only see this
metadata for images created *after* the option has been set.
(2) The example is misleading in that it uses the same UUID for the
mountpoint and for the image_id, which I suppose would work, but it
makes it look like the two fields are related.
See discussion about this in the glance channel log:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-
glance/%23openstack-glance.2018-06-01.log.html#t2018-06-01T20:26:28 to
about 21:05
In glance_store:
The help text for this option is a bit vague; could stand a rewrite
based on the improvements made in the glance docs.
See
https://github.com/openstack/glance_store/blob/cc97b949033f892d6675692cbc8a24df3ce0e15e/glance_store/_drivers/filesystem.py#L109-L125
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1775736/+subscriptions
References