zeitgeist team mailing list archive

[Seif Lotfy <614284@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Are you sure this is fts and not wildcards ?

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Markus Korn <thekorn@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Public bug reported:
>
> Michal reported a bug in the fts extension on irc today:
>
> 11:06 < mhr3> second, once there's a bit more complex query, it no longer
>              expands stuff
> 11:07 < mhr3> ie searching for "v*" and "(v*) AND (())" returns different
>              results
> 11:08 < mhr3> i'm now not sure if "(v) AND (())" vs "v" also returns
> different
>              stuff
> 11:09 < mhr3> but it's possible
>
> ** Affects: zeitgeist-dataproviders
>     Importance: Undecided
>         Status: New
>
> --
> fts extension is not expanding stuff correctly in queries
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614284
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to The
> Zeitgeist Project.
>
> Status in Zeitgeist Data-Sources: New
>
> Bug description:
> Michal reported a bug in the fts extension on irc today:
>
> 11:06 < mhr3> second, once there's a bit more complex query, it no longer
>              expands stuff
> 11:07 < mhr3> ie searching for "v*" and "(v*) AND (())" returns different
>              results
> 11:08 < mhr3> i'm now not sure if "(v) AND (())" vs "v" also returns
> different
>              stuff
> 11:09 < mhr3> but it's possible
>
>
>


-- 
This is me doing some advertisement for my blog http://seilo.geekyogre.com

-- 
fts extension is not expanding stuff correctly in queries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614284
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Data-Sources.

Status in Zeitgeist Data-Sources: New

Bug description:
Michal reported a bug in the fts extension on irc today:

11:06 < mhr3> second, once there's a bit more complex query, it no longer 
              expands stuff
11:07 < mhr3> ie searching for "v*" and "(v*) AND (())" returns different 
              results
11:08 < mhr3> i'm now not sure if "(v) AND (())" vs "v" also returns different 
              stuff
11:09 < mhr3> but it's possible