zeitgeist team mailing list archive
-
zeitgeist team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01931
[Bug 646124] Re: Wrong understanding of the LeastRecentActors
We discussed this issue on IRC, a summary:
* the current definition of LeastRecentActors is wrong, it should be "application I have not used for the longest time"
* we need a new ResultType for the old definition ("The first event of each different actor"), something like OldestActor
The plan to fix this bug is:
1.) Fix the initial issue described in bug 641968 (LeastRecentActors is not working together with templates)
2.) land the fix for 1.) in lp:zeitgeist
3.) rename LeastRecentActor into something like OldestActor (we still need a smart name for this)
4.) reimplement LeastRecentActor to return the result as descibed in the various examples here
5.) land 3.) and 4.) to lp:zeitgeist at the same time
--
Wrong understanding of the LeastRecentActors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646124
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framework.
Status in Zeitgeist Framework: New
Bug description:
In an attempt to work on bug #641968 I discovered that we some of us defer on the understanding of LeastRecentActor
The documentation stated that LeastRecentActor = enum_factory(("The first event of each different actor"))
Let's assume we have sequential events. (The actors are defined by numbers)
2, 1, 3, 2, 1, 4
So we have 4 different actors (1,2,3,4) and we want to sort them by least recent.
the least recent is not 2 or 1 since they are used again at the end. the least recent is 3
This means LeastRecentActors should return the latest actors sorted ASC:
3, 2, 1, 4
and not
2, 1, 3, 4
When we look at LeastRecentSubjects = enum_factory(("One event for each subject only, "
"ordered with oldest events first"))
My understanding according to Siegfried is:
<seif_> RainCT,
<seif_> LeastRecentSubjects = enum_factory(("One event for each subject only, "
<seif_> "ordered with oldest events first")
<seif_> so i f i have
<seif_> the subject
<seif_> 1, 2, 1, 3, 4
<seif_> what do i get returned
<seif_> 1, 2, 3, 4
<seif_> or
<seif_> 2, 1, 3, 4
<seif_> ?
<RainCT> seif_: the later
<RainCT> for each subject you only look at the most recent one
<seif_> ok then we should do the same for the actors :)
<RainCT> Yes. Isn't it like this already?
<seif_> no
In that case if we follow this convention I can update the doc strings and already have the bug fix for both this bug and #641968
References