zeitgeist team mailing list archive

[Siegfried Gevatter <rainct@xxxxxxxxxx>]

** Changed in: zeitgeist
    Milestone: 0.5.2 => 0.6

** Changed in: zeitgeist
    Milestone: 0.6 => 0.5.2

-- 
Wrong understanding of the LeastRecentActors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646124
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framework.

Status in Zeitgeist Framework: Fix Committed

Bug description:
In an attempt to work on bug #641968 I discovered that we some of us defer on the understanding of LeastRecentActor

The documentation stated that LeastRecentActor = enum_factory(("The first event of each different actor"))

Let's assume we have sequential events. (The actors are defined by numbers)

2, 1, 3, 2, 1, 4

So we have 4 different actors (1,2,3,4) and we want to sort them by least recent.
the least recent is not 2 or 1 since they are used again at the end. the least recent is 3

This means LeastRecentActors should return the latest actors sorted ASC:

3, 2, 1, 4

and not

2, 1, 3, 4

When we look at LeastRecentSubjects = enum_factory(("One event for each subject only, "
  "ordered with oldest events first"))
My understanding according to Siegfried is:

<seif_> RainCT,
<seif_> LeastRecentSubjects = enum_factory(("One event for each subject only, "
<seif_>   "ordered with oldest events first")
<seif_> so i f i have
<seif_> the subject
<seif_> 1, 2, 1, 3, 4
<seif_> what do i get returned
<seif_> 1, 2, 3, 4
<seif_> or
<seif_> 2, 1, 3, 4
<seif_> ?
<RainCT> seif_: the later
<RainCT> for each subject you only look at the most recent one
<seif_> ok then we should do the same for the actors :)
<RainCT> Yes. Isn't it like this already?
<seif_> no

In that case if we follow this convention I can update the doc strings and already have the bug fix for both this bug and #641968