zeitgeist team mailing list archive
-
zeitgeist team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03545
[Bug 787868] Re: Encryption of database
It is likely that the attack surface here is very large during execution
and the above protection would probably only be useful for data at rest
(sqlcipher) and against key recovery attacks that involve ptrace by non-
root users (on ubuntu).
An attacker will still be able to become a Zeitgeist client and pull the
data out of the database as part of an API call of some sort.
So overall, I think that this limits the attack surface considerably but
without a comprehensive API filter of some kind, it's possible that
malware on the system (or a forensics person who popped a shell) will
still be able to siphon out data.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framework.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787868
Title:
Encryption of database
Status in Zeitgeist Framework:
New
Bug description:
I think that Zeitgeist should encrypt databases in
~/.local/share/zeitgeist/* for anti-forensics reasons.
While someone may happen to use an encrypted disk, Zeitgeist may serve
as the ultimate accidental spyware to an unsuspecting user. One
possible mitigation is to randomly generate a reasonable key, tie it
into the login keychain and then use that key with something like
http://sqlcipher.net/ rather than straight sqlite.
In theory, a user will never know that this encryption/decryption is
happening - no underlying assumptions about the disk need to be made
to maintain any security guarantees. This should prevent anyone from
learning the contents of the database without also learning the login
password. Modern Ubuntu machines disallow non-root ptracing (
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Roadmap/KernelHardening#ptrace )
and if the gnome keyring is locked, an attacker would have a much
harder time grabbing meaningful Zeitgeist data without interacting
with the user or bruteforcing the login keychain.
References