zeitgeist team mailing list archive
-
zeitgeist team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #05050
Re: [Merge] lp:~mhr3/zeitgeist/fts-secondary-sorting into lp:zeitgeist
I'm starting to think that doing the secondary sorting in FTS isn't a good idea, we're sending the relevancies to the client, so we should keep the full Zeitgeist sorting, and since the client has the relevancies, it can do this kind of sort itself (or not).
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~mhr3/zeitgeist/fts-secondary-sorting/+merge/96479
Your team Zeitgeist Framework Team is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~mhr3/zeitgeist/fts-secondary-sorting into lp:zeitgeist.
References