zorba-coders team mailing list archive
-
zorba-coders team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #05294
Re: [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/ft-base64Binary into lp:zorba
Review: Approve
include/zorba/item.h: Docs do not say what happens, if
getBase64BinaryValue is called when the item is streamable.
include/zorba/item_factory.h: "whence" isn't the most commonly used word
(http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/whence) maybe we could use another one
src/runtime/base64/base64_impl.cpp:43 is it ok to ignore the result of
consumeNext because the input can't be an empty sequence? If so, should
we add a comment?
Could we implement Base64BinaryItem::getStringValue() using
Base64BinaryItem::getStringValue2(zstring& val)?
Does Base64BinaryItem::getStringValue2(zstring& val) work if val is not
empty? It seems that theValue would be prepended to the current content
of val. Could we implement this method by emptying val and calling
Base64BinaryItem::appendStringValue on it?
StreamableBase64BinaryItem::materialize():
- Is there a reason for the number 4048?
- In general those might be a lot of re-allocations, if the item is a
little larger (e.g. if the item is 1MB, we've got more than 250
re-allocations). I'm not sure where the right trade-off is, but it
seems that this parameter might become expensive (if someone
materializes a large item that should be streamed …)
I just hope that src/zorbaserialization/zorba_class_serializer.cpp works.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/ft-base64Binary/+merge/94081
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
Follow ups
References