zorba-coders team mailing list archive

[Cezar Andrei <cezar.andrei@xxxxxxxxx>]

I understand, it make sense in this way but it's very dangerous, in this
way I don't think it helps the users on contrary can leave bad code falsely
working.

Cezar

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Ghislain Fourny <ghislain.fourny@xxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:

> Hi Cezar,
>
> In general, an object constructor expression is not always valid JSON, as
> it is more general. For example, { 1 : 1 } is valid JSONiq although it is
> not valid JSON. A key expression, can be anything, and will be atomized and
> cast to xs:string.
>
> Also, { "null" : 1 } (which is what is produced) is valid JSON, just like
> { "1" : 1 }.
>
> Accepting { null : 1 } in the same way makes the specification simpler, as
> we need not special-case.
>
> Does it make sense?
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix-1046415/+merge/123283
> Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
> Post to     : zorba-coders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>

-- 
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix-1046415/+merge/123283
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.