zorba-coders team mailing list archive

[Sorin Marian Nasoi <sorin.marian.nasoi@xxxxxxxxx>]

> I will take a look of this but if I am not wrong the ones failing are not
> actually using the function nilled. not sure why these tests are done for
> nilled but I will take a look.
Please look in 
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug1147563/revision/11279
Line 336 to 340, line 342, 344 and 345.
Those are the 8 fn:nilled test cases I am referring to as still failing.

> And actually not only 7 tests were solved the whole function was actually
> broken it had a behavior in which it always returned false so all the tests
> that expected a false response were passing.
After your fix, there were 7 progressions:
Please see
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug1147563/revision/11279
Lines 333, 334, 335, 341, 343, 346 and 347.
These are the 7 test cases I am referring to as progressions.

-- 
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug1147563/+merge/153485
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.