arsenal-user team mailing list archive

[Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 05/18/2012 01:32 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> I've bumped the stable branch from 0.5 to 1.0, with one minor bug fix
> (#988312).  Along with this I've filed an SRU to get the fix into
> precise.
> 
> I'd like to propose that as a general policy for the lpltk 1.x branch
> that we keep it in sync with what's in precise-proposed.  So in other
> words, all changes to lpltk 1.x should be SRU'd to precise.
> 
> This would be pretty restrictive, but following the SRU process would
> give us a defined level of rigor for deciding what should be included.
> Also, I figure people who care about this level of stability quite
> likely will be on precise already, and would prefer pulling fixes from
> precise-updates rather than a PPA.
> 
> What do you think?

It sounds like a good policy to me, but I haven't worked too much with
lpltk.

-- Chase