bzr-windows team mailing list archive

[John Arbash Meinel <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ian Clatworthy wrote:
> John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> 
>> For simplicity, I'd like to stick with python2.5 and PyQt 4.4 for this
>> release. We can look at bumping it to py 2.6 + PyQt >= 4.6 for the next one.
> 
> I wonder whether we'd be better served by having our Windows users
> running on the same PyQt release as our Ubuntu and OS X users? Lucid
> currently has 4.6.0 and I believe the OS X installers are bundling 4.6.x.
> 
> Disclaimer: My motivation here is slightly selfish. I accidentally
> started using some post 4.4 APIs to tune widget layouts recently. I'll
> go through and make them conditional on the right version of Qt being
> installed today. Even so, it always feels odd to me to not take
> advantage of APIs offering a better user experience without a compelling
> reason. In the case of Windows (unlike most Linux distros), *we* get to
> dictate the Qt version so I feel we ought to take the latest unless
> there's clear evidence it's a bad idea.
> 
> I agree that sticking with py 2.5 + PyQt 4.4 is the easiest answer right
> now. OTOH, rc1 has a few weeks of testing time up its sleeve so we
> *could* upgrade now and address any issues as they come up. Could we try
> PtQt 4.6.x in combination with Python 2.5 say?
> 
> Ian C.
> 

At pretty much any point in time, there is only one available pyqt
release for any python version. At least from Riverbank. I think I have
a 4.6.2 exe for py 2.6 here, but I don't have it for python 2.5.

Currently: http://www.riverbankcomputing.co.uk/software/pyqt/download
has only 4.7.1 for all versions of python.

John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAktY8rAACgkQJdeBCYSNAAM38QCfYZJLRSUX69XcOG6EO+SjP6V7
b2IAniPPDI39paR+qoKR84Vfc5wH974I
=2qZ5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----