← Back to team overview

c2c-oerpscenario team mailing list archive

[Bug 682579] Re: SSLError: [Errno 336265218] _ssl.c:339: error:140B0002:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file:system lib

 

** Changed in: openobject-server
       Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: openobject-server
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: openobject-server
     Assignee: (unassigned) => OpenERP's Framework R&D (openerp-dev-framework)

-- 
SSLError: [Errno 336265218] _ssl.c:339: error:140B0002:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file:system lib
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of C2C
OERPScenario, which is subscribed to the OpenERP Project Group.

Status in OpenObject Server: Confirmed

Bug description:
I can't connect to a remote server using the secure port, I dot this error in the server output :


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/openerp/openerp/server/bin/service/websrv_lib.py", line 527, in _handle_request2
    self.process_request(request, client_address)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/SocketServer.py", line 309, in process_request
    self.finish_request(request, client_address)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/SocketServer.py", line 322, in finish_request
    self.RequestHandlerClass(request, client_address, self)
  File "/home/openerp/openerp/server/bin/service/websrv_lib.py", line 245, in __init__
    SocketServer.StreamRequestHandler.__init__(self,request,client_address,server)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/SocketServer.py", line 616, in __init__
    self.setup()
  File "/home/openerp/openerp/server/bin/service/websrv_lib.py", line 464, in setup
    ssl_version=ssl.PROTOCOL_SSLv23)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/ssl.py", line 338, in wrap_socket
    suppress_ragged_eofs=suppress_ragged_eofs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/ssl.py", line 118, in __init__
    cert_reqs, ssl_version, ca_certs)
SSLError: [Errno 336265218] _ssl.c:339: error:140B0002:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file:system lib

In fact, I don't understand the error, so if it's not a bug, maybe you could make the error easier to understand ?





References