c2c-oerpscenario team mailing list archive

[Open Net Sàrl <openerp@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

We did the following test on OE server 6-trunk:
In multi-company mode:
1. the user is working for company A
1. setup the accounts receivable/Payable for a partner
2. change the company the user is working for (user preferences): the company B for example
3. setup other accounts receivable/Payable for the partner (select for the new company)
4. change your user's company: re-select company A
5. reload your partner: the account properties will keep the ones with the highest Database ID, ignoring the company

We've looked at the source: osv/fields.py, class: property
1. the function: _fnct_write( .... ) seems to use the user's default company
2. in the function: _fnct_read( ... ), this does not look really obvious that the user's company is taken into account

We suspect that the write process is correct, and the read process seems
to fail

Best regards

** Affects: openobject-server
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of C2C
OERPScenario, which is subscribed to the OpenERP Project Group.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691541

Title:
  Company ID in properties

Status in OpenObject Server:
  New

Bug description:
  We did the following test on OE server 6-trunk:
In multi-company mode:
1. the user is working for company A
1. setup the accounts receivable/Payable for a partner
2. change the company the user is working for (user preferences): the company B for example
3. setup other accounts receivable/Payable for the partner (select for the new company)
4. change your user's company: re-select company A
5. reload your partner: the account properties will keep the ones with the highest Database ID, ignoring the company

We've looked at the source: osv/fields.py, class: property
1. the function: _fnct_write( .... ) seems to use the user's default company
2. in the function: _fnct_read( ... ), this does not look really obvious that the user's company is taken into account

We suspect that the write process is correct, and the read process seems to fail

Best regards