c2c-oerpscenario team mailing list archive
-
c2c-oerpscenario team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #19977
[Bug 741457] [NEW] Multiple UOM not handled by Inventory Analysis
Public bug reported:
version: 6.0.1 stable
rev: 4467 (addons)
platform: Ubuntu 10.04
1. Create a UOMs as follows:
"PCE" of category "unit" with ratio = 1
"CT (12)" of category "unit" with ratio = 12
2. Create a product:
name="Orval Beer"
cost=12.00
default Unit of Measure="CT (12)"
default Purchase Unit of Measure="CT (12)"
Assign a Supplier for later Purchase Order test
3. Add starting stock:
On product form, click "Update" button and add stock quantity of 10.00 to "Stock" location.
4. Perform Inventory Analysis.
Run: Warehouse/Reporting/Inventory Analysis
Search for "Orval" to locate the product
Issue#1 "Quantity" is NOT expressed in the products "default UOM" (should be 10.00 not 120.00)
Issue#2 "Total Value" is INCORRECT at 1440.00 (should be 120.00)
5. Perform a Procurement/Purchase/Reception
Purchase and receive 10.00 with a UOM of "CT (12)"
Examining the Product Form all looks okay, now 20.00 CT (12) in Real
and Virtual Stock.
6. Perform Inventory Analysis
Notice that now "Quantity" is 240.00 and "Total Value" is 2880.00 (at least consistent)
Looking behind the scene a little, the "report_stock_move" view in postgres is storing:
a. "product_qty" column as 10.00 being a UOM of "CT (12)"
b. "product_qty_in" as 120.00 being a UOM of "PCE"
This looks like trouble mixing representations of QUANTITY/UOM.
report_stock_move table/view records the "product_uom" as being "CT
(12)" and yet "product_qty_in" is recorded as a UOM of "PCE"
----------------------------------------------
My summary of situation:
1. Invoice Analysis should express to user the "Quantity" as the product's default UOM
2. generation of report_stock_move records should be consistent when representing a quantity in the record.
ps: wish we had a preview function before posting, hope layout is okay
** Affects: openobject-addons
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of C2C
OERPScenario, which is subscribed to the OpenERP Project Group.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741457
Title:
Multiple UOM not handled by Inventory Analysis
Status in OpenERP Modules (addons):
New
Bug description:
version: 6.0.1 stable
rev: 4467 (addons)
platform: Ubuntu 10.04
1. Create a UOMs as follows:
"PCE" of category "unit" with ratio = 1
"CT (12)" of category "unit" with ratio = 12
2. Create a product:
name="Orval Beer"
cost=12.00
default Unit of Measure="CT (12)"
default Purchase Unit of Measure="CT (12)"
Assign a Supplier for later Purchase Order test
3. Add starting stock:
On product form, click "Update" button and add stock quantity of 10.00 to "Stock" location.
4. Perform Inventory Analysis.
Run: Warehouse/Reporting/Inventory Analysis
Search for "Orval" to locate the product
Issue#1 "Quantity" is NOT expressed in the products "default UOM" (should be 10.00 not 120.00)
Issue#2 "Total Value" is INCORRECT at 1440.00 (should be 120.00)
5. Perform a Procurement/Purchase/Reception
Purchase and receive 10.00 with a UOM of "CT (12)"
Examining the Product Form all looks okay, now 20.00 CT (12) in
Real and Virtual Stock.
6. Perform Inventory Analysis
Notice that now "Quantity" is 240.00 and "Total Value" is 2880.00 (at least consistent)
Looking behind the scene a little, the "report_stock_move" view in postgres is storing:
a. "product_qty" column as 10.00 being a UOM of "CT (12)"
b. "product_qty_in" as 120.00 being a UOM of "PCE"
This looks like trouble mixing representations of QUANTITY/UOM.
report_stock_move table/view records the "product_uom" as being "CT
(12)" and yet "product_qty_in" is recorded as a UOM of "PCE"
----------------------------------------------
My summary of situation:
1. Invoice Analysis should express to user the "Quantity" as the product's default UOM
2. generation of report_stock_move records should be consistent when representing a quantity in the record.
ps: wish we had a preview function before posting, hope layout is okay
Follow ups
-
[Bug 741457] Re: Multiple UOM not handled by Inventory Analysis
From: Kyle Waid - http://www.gcotech.com, 2011-06-01
-
[Bug 741457] Re: Multiple UOM not handled by Inventory Analysis
From: Chandra Limanjaya, 2011-05-26
-
[Bug 741457] Re: Multiple UOM not handled by Inventory Analysis
From: Chandra Limanjaya, 2011-05-26
-
[Bug 741457] Re: Multiple UOM not handled by Inventory Analysis
From: Jay Vora (OpenERP), 2011-05-06
-
[Bug 741457] Re: Multiple UOM not handled by Inventory Analysis
From: Jay Vora (OpenERP), 2011-05-06
-
[Bug 741457] Re: Multiple UOM not handled by Inventory Analysis
From: qdp (OpenERP), 2011-04-27
-
[Bug 741457] Re: Multiple UOM not handled by Inventory Analysis
From: Rohan Nayani(openerp), 2011-04-05
-
[Bug 741457] Re: Multiple UOM not handled by Inventory Analysis
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-04-05
-
[Bug 741457] Re: Multiple UOM not handled by Inventory Analysis
From: Rohan Nayani(openerp), 2011-04-01
-
[Bug 741457] Re: [6.0.1] Multiple UOM not handled by Inventory Analysis
From: Devishree Brahmbhatt (OpenERP), 2011-04-01
-
[Bug 741457] Re: [6.0.1] Multiple UOM not handled by Inventory Analysis
From: snook, 2011-03-25
-
[Bug 741457] [NEW] Multiple UOM not handled by Inventory Analysis
From: snook, 2011-03-24
References