canonical-ubuntu-qa team mailing list archive
-
canonical-ubuntu-qa team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06525
[Bug 2107440] [NEW] powerpc/mm:exec_prot fails on testing read on --x on Power9 PowerVM with Oracular
Public bug reported:
Failure observed on oracular linux 6.11.0-25.25 (s2025.03.17) and
6.11.0-26.26 (2025.04.14) on metal P9g-LPAR01kernel (Power9 PowerVM).
Log output:
# selftests: powerpc/mm: exec_prot
# test: exec_prot
# tags: git_version:unknown
# [SKIP] Test skipped on line 89
# [FAIL] Test FAILED on line 175
# Testing read on --x, should fault...failure: exec_prot
not ok 1 selftests: powerpc/mm: exec_prot # exit=1
This is the first time we run powerpc/mm:exec_prot on P9g-LPAR01kernel,
which implies that this might not be a regression. This test case passed
on other environments over many SRU cycles.
** Affects: ubuntu-kernel-tests
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: oracular ppc64el ubuntu-kernel-selftests
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical
Platform QA Team, which is subscribed to ubuntu-kernel-tests.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107440
Title:
powerpc/mm:exec_prot fails on testing read on --x on Power9 PowerVM
with Oracular
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
New
Bug description:
Failure observed on oracular linux 6.11.0-25.25 (s2025.03.17) and
6.11.0-26.26 (2025.04.14) on metal P9g-LPAR01kernel (Power9 PowerVM).
Log output:
# selftests: powerpc/mm: exec_prot
# test: exec_prot
# tags: git_version:unknown
# [SKIP] Test skipped on line 89
# [FAIL] Test FAILED on line 175
# Testing read on --x, should fault...failure: exec_prot
not ok 1 selftests: powerpc/mm: exec_prot # exit=1
This is the first time we run powerpc/mm:exec_prot on
P9g-LPAR01kernel, which implies that this might not be a regression.
This test case passed on other environments over many SRU cycles.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2107440/+subscriptions