canonical-ubuntu-qa team mailing list archive
-
canonical-ubuntu-qa team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06526
[Bug 2107442] [NEW] powerpc/signal:signal_tm fails on FAIL_IF(tcheck_transactional()) check on Power9 PowerVM with Oracular
Public bug reported:
Failure observed on oracular linux 6.11.0-25.25 (s2025.03.17) and
6.11.0-26.26 (2025.04.14) on metal P9g-LPAR01kernel (Power9 PowerVM).
Log output:
# selftests: powerpc/signal: signal_tm
# test: signal_tm
# tags: git_version:unknown
# [FAIL] Test FAILED on line 72
# failure: signal_tm
not ok 1 selftests: powerpc/signal: signal_tm # exit=1
This is the first time we are running powerpc/signal:signal_tm on
P9g-LPAR01kernel, so it may not be a regression. This test case has
passed on other environments across multiple SRU cycles.
** Affects: ubuntu-kernel-tests
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: oracular ppc64el ubuntu-kernel-selftests
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical
Platform QA Team, which is subscribed to ubuntu-kernel-tests.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107442
Title:
powerpc/signal:signal_tm fails on FAIL_IF(tcheck_transactional())
check on Power9 PowerVM with Oracular
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
New
Bug description:
Failure observed on oracular linux 6.11.0-25.25 (s2025.03.17) and
6.11.0-26.26 (2025.04.14) on metal P9g-LPAR01kernel (Power9 PowerVM).
Log output:
# selftests: powerpc/signal: signal_tm
# test: signal_tm
# tags: git_version:unknown
# [FAIL] Test FAILED on line 72
# failure: signal_tm
not ok 1 selftests: powerpc/signal: signal_tm # exit=1
This is the first time we are running powerpc/signal:signal_tm on
P9g-LPAR01kernel, so it may not be a regression. This test case has
passed on other environments across multiple SRU cycles.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2107442/+subscriptions
Follow ups