clicompanion-devs team mailing list archive

[Matthew Byers <faintstlsaint@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes i updated the previous blueprint on testing. I guess i forgot this one.
Well testing on my end involving installing older packages and upgrading to
source builds on debian, ubuntu (from 10.04-12.04 alpha) and gnome3.

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Jonathan Marsden <jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> On 12/12/2011 08:41 AM, Matthew Byers wrote:
>
> > I am also curious as to our status. I was tracking that we should be
> > ready for at least a new release over a month ago but it seems we
> > have pushed all efforts into getting into upstream which should not
> > be our priority. We need to release soon
>
>
> Well, we seem to be somewhere in the middle of testing the current
> codebase, which is Step 1 of our release-plan-1.1.  I had said:
>
> >> Is the application itself 100% ready for declaring to be clicompanion
> >> 1.1 and being released as a source tarball?  If not, what else needs to
> >> be done with it to reach that point?  According to
> >>
> >>  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/clicompanion/+spec/release-plan-1.1
> >>
> >> we have had some testing "IN PROGRESS" for the last couple of weeks...
> >> are there any status updates on how that is going?
>
>
> One of the work items in that spec is yours; any update on how
>
>  [stlsaint] Test running build from source in 11.10 with gnome3: IN
> PROGRESS
>
> is going? :)
>
> Do we have some sort of standard "checklist of the basic things to test
> in clicompanion" document somewhere?  So that all testers test at least
> a basic minimal set of clicompanion features and capabilities?
>
> Further, do we have a place (a wiki page, maybe?) to log all completed
> tests, showing who tested what (clicompanion version, installation
> method, OS/Distro, DE, screen size) when, and whether it passed our
> standard set of tests, and what bug reports were generated?
>
> Jonathan
>
>


-- 
God Bless