coapp-developers team mailing list archive
-
coapp-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00182
Re: Portable application deployment
Well, you can do that too.
Which would be perfectly fine. I fully support that type of scenario, and the developer tools will help make that a lot easier.
Garrett Serack | Open Source Software Developer | Microsoft Corporation
I don't make the software you use; I make the software you use better on Windows.
-----Original Message-----
From: Olaf van der Spek [mailto:olafvdspek@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 1:55 PM
To: Garrett Serack
Cc: Gerald Combs; coapp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Coapp-developers] Portable application deployment
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Garrett Serack <garretts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Not really. Well--maybe--but not in the way you think, and likely this won't happen for a bit.
>
> Portable applications rely on a total lack of shared libraries; rather the complete autonomous packaging of everything needed to accomplish a particular task, and without installing anything.
What stops one from just linking everything statically?
Olaf
References