coapp-developers team mailing list archive

["William A. Rowe Jr." <wmrowe@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 5/5/2010 4:13 PM, Adam Baxter wrote:
> The compromise may be a *nix utility to verify that everything's ready
> to send to CoApp. If there are some developers who can't afford a copy
> of Windows, that's probably one instance where CoApp as an organisation
> would be really helpful.

What about allowing a project maintainer to root the sandbox to their application
when subscribing to the build results?  That way they could have confluence-like
builds of their app in almost real time, which is as useful as installing the
CoApp toolchain and running it on their own box.

Of course the CoApp team would probably want the final call to validate binary
compatibility and all that, as to what goes to CoApp's distribution.  But letting
projects participate at the sandbox/alpha phase just to prove all is well seems
like a really slick idea.

I know httpd folks would appreciate seeing their buggy commits raise a flag asap
if it broke the windows platform, since it's usually a trivial fix.