coapp-developers team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: Code?

To: Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Philip Allison <mangobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 13:10:01 +0100
Cc: Elizabeth M Smith <emsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "coapp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <coapp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <AANLkTilAhzmpJiTYpK3jO1nKPL7buadKwnJkZsxG9tPA@mail.gmail.com>

On 18 May 2010 11:07, Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Obviously our API and ABI will be C. This doesn't mean the
> implementation has to be C as well, right?

It doesn't *have* to be, but it makes life much easier if it is.  Any
other choice would see us fighting with the language to achieve our
goals (small, fast, easy to bind, has no dependencies not satisfied by
Windows itself).  Ease of binding and no dependencies make C an
obvious choice, as has already been discussed.

Regards,
Phil

References

Code?
From: Olaf van der Spek, 2010-05-17
Re: Code?
From: Rivera, Rafael, 2010-05-17
Re: Code?
From: Olaf van der Spek, 2010-05-17
Re: Code?
From: Elizabeth M Smith, 2010-05-17
Re: Code?
From: Olaf van der Spek, 2010-05-17
Re: Code?
From: Elizabeth M Smith, 2010-05-17
Re: Code?
From: Olaf van der Spek, 2010-05-18