compiz team mailing list archive
-
compiz team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #35013
[Bug 1004475] [NEW] Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
Public bug reported:
When resume from suspend the desktop loads but Unity runs very slow.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Info:
-->lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release: 12.04
Codename: precise
-->uname -a
Linux myBox 3.2.0-24-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Mon May 21 16:52:17 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
-->apt-cache policy unity
unity:
Installed: 5.12-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 5.12-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 5.12-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
5.10.0-0ubuntu6 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages
-->apt-cache policy compiz
compiz:
Installed: 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1:0.9.7.6-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages
-->dpkg -s Xorg | grep Version
Version: 1:7.6+12ubuntu1
-->glxinfo | grep OpenGL
OpenGL vendor string: X.Org
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER
OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 8.0.2
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20
-->lspci -nn | grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Juniper [Radeon HD 5700 Series] [1002:68b8]
Hardware
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4P
Processor: Intel Core i7-870 Processor
Graphics: Gigabyte ATI Radeon HD 5770 GV-R577UD-1GD (Batmobile)
Memory: 16GB (4 x 4GB) G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) F3-12800CL9D-8GBRL
SSD Drive: Crucial 64GB m4 2.5-inch SATA 6GB/s
Monitor: 2x Samsung P2770
Discussion link:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=11962793#post11962793
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fresh boot; before suspend
-->glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
303 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.440 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.968 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.966 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.970 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.967 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.968 FPS
After suspend
-->glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
188 frames in 5.0 seconds = 37.560 FPS
194 frames in 5.0 seconds = 38.670 FPS
196 frames in 5.0 seconds = 39.068 FPS
198 frames in 5.0 seconds = 39.599 FPS
201 frames in 5.0 seconds = 40.198 FPS
200 frames in 5.0 seconds = 39.868 FPS
After compiz --replace
-->glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
303 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.457 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.797 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.997 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.999 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.998 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.998 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.998 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.798 FPS
It doesn't look like it is only affecting Launcher performance when
suspend was used. I'm not sure if this would be a separate issue so
decided to include it here for now. Here is some more details.
Fresh boot; suspend not used
At first all looks good. Launcher opens and closes quickly but after few minutes of regular use I can see performance degradation when using Launcher. Everything else still works good.
-->glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
302 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.245 FPS<= Launcher closed
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.798 FPS
301 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.002 FPS
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.596 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.799 FPS
102 frames in 5.1 seconds = 20.030 FPS<= pressing “Super”; Launcher slowly opens
30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.780 FPS
30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.759 FPS
30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.780 FPS
31 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.962 FPS
32 frames in 5.2 seconds = 6.172 FPS
31 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.984 FPS
30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.788 FPS
105 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.984 FPS<= pressing ESC; Launcher slowly closes
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.600 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.600 FPS
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.595 FPS
301 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.001 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.996 FPS
293 frames in 5.0 seconds = 58.597 FPS
49 frames in 5.2 seconds = 9.438 FPS<= pressing “Super”; Launcher slowly opens
31 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.961 FPS
34 frames in 5.2 seconds = 6.529 FPS
30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.791 FPS
29 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.595 FPS
33 frames in 5.2 seconds = 6.305 FPS
105 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.984 FPS<= pressing ESC; Launcher slowly closes
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.799 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.998 FPS
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.599 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.996 FPS
Everything seems to be very slow when Launcher is open and comes back to
normal after Launcher is closed.
Replacing compiz windows:
-->compiz --replace
-->glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
303 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.494 FPS<= Launcher closed
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.598 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.797 FPS
291 frames in 5.0 seconds = 58.199 FPS<= pressing “Super”; Launcher quickly opens
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.799 FPS
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.515 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.679 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.999 FPS<= pressing ESC; Launcher quickly closes
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.798 FPS
297 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.315 FPS
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.395 FPS
297 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.399 FPS<= pressing “Super”; Launcher quickly opens
296 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.089 FPS
This will work good for some time (10 maybe 20 minutes) and will go back
to degraded performance again.
** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
When resume from suspend the desktop loads but Unity runs very slow.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Info:
-->lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release: 12.04
Codename: precise
-->uname -a
Linux myBox 3.2.0-24-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Mon May 21 16:52:17 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
-->apt-cache policy unity
unity:
- Installed: 5.12-0ubuntu1
- Candidate: 5.12-0ubuntu1
- Version table:
- *** 5.12-0ubuntu1 0
- 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages
- 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
- 5.10.0-0ubuntu6 0
- 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages
+ Installed: 5.12-0ubuntu1
+ Candidate: 5.12-0ubuntu1
+ Version table:
+ *** 5.12-0ubuntu1 0
+ 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages
+ 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
+ 5.10.0-0ubuntu6 0
+ 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages
-->apt-cache policy compiz
compiz:
- Installed: 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1
- Candidate: 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1
- Version table:
- *** 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1 0
- 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages
- 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
- 1:0.9.7.6-0ubuntu1 0
- 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages
+ Installed: 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1
+ Candidate: 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1
+ Version table:
+ *** 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1 0
+ 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages
+ 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
+ 1:0.9.7.6-0ubuntu1 0
+ 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages
-->dpkg -s Xorg | grep Version
Version: 1:7.6+12ubuntu1
-->glxinfo | grep OpenGL
OpenGL vendor string: X.Org
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER
OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 8.0.2
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20
-->lspci -nn | grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Juniper [Radeon HD 5700 Series] [1002:68b8]
Hardware
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4P
Processor: Intel Core i7-870 Processor
Graphics: Gigabyte ATI Radeon HD 5770 GV-R577UD-1GD (Batmobile)
Memory: 16GB (4 x 4GB) G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) F3-12800CL9D-8GBRL
SSD Drive: Crucial 64GB m4 2.5-inch SATA 6GB/s
Monitor: 2x Samsung P2770
Discussion link:
- http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=11967277#post11967277
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=11967277
+ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Fresh boot; before suspend
- -->glxgears
+ Fresh boot; before suspend
+ -->glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
303 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.440 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.968 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.966 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.970 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.967 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.968 FPS
- After suspend
- -->glxgears
- Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
- approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
- 188 frames in 5.0 seconds = 37.560 FPS
- 194 frames in 5.0 seconds = 38.670 FPS
- 196 frames in 5.0 seconds = 39.068 FPS
- 198 frames in 5.0 seconds = 39.599 FPS
- 201 frames in 5.0 seconds = 40.198 FPS
- 200 frames in 5.0 seconds = 39.868 FPS
+ After suspend
+ -->glxgears
+ Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
+ approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
+ 188 frames in 5.0 seconds = 37.560 FPS
+ 194 frames in 5.0 seconds = 38.670 FPS
+ 196 frames in 5.0 seconds = 39.068 FPS
+ 198 frames in 5.0 seconds = 39.599 FPS
+ 201 frames in 5.0 seconds = 40.198 FPS
+ 200 frames in 5.0 seconds = 39.868 FPS
After compiz --replace
- -->glxgears
- Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
- approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
- 303 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.457 FPS
- 299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.797 FPS
- 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.997 FPS
- 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.999 FPS
- 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.998 FPS
- 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.998 FPS
- 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.998 FPS
+ -->glxgears
+ Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
+ approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
+ 303 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.457 FPS
+ 299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.797 FPS
+ 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.997 FPS
+ 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.999 FPS
+ 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.998 FPS
+ 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.998 FPS
+ 300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.998 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.798 FPS
-
- It doesn't look like it is only affecting Launcher performance when suspend was used. I'm not sure if this would be a separate issue so decided to include it here for now. Here is some more details.
+ It doesn't look like it is only affecting Launcher performance when
+ suspend was used. I'm not sure if this would be a separate issue so
+ decided to include it here for now. Here is some more details.
Fresh boot; suspend not used
At first all looks good. Launcher opens and closes quickly but after few minutes of regular use I can see performance degradation when using Launcher. Everything else still works good.
- -->glxgears
+ -->glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
302 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.245 FPS<= Launcher closed
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.798 FPS
301 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.002 FPS
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.596 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.799 FPS
102 frames in 5.1 seconds = 20.030 FPS<= pressing “Super”; Launcher slowly opens
- 30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.780 FPS
+ 30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.780 FPS
30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.759 FPS
30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.780 FPS
31 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.962 FPS
32 frames in 5.2 seconds = 6.172 FPS
31 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.984 FPS
30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.788 FPS
105 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.984 FPS<= pressing ESC; Launcher slowly closes
- 299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.600 FPS
+ 299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.600 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.600 FPS
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.595 FPS
301 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.001 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.996 FPS
293 frames in 5.0 seconds = 58.597 FPS
49 frames in 5.2 seconds = 9.438 FPS<= pressing “Super”; Launcher slowly opens
31 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.961 FPS
34 frames in 5.2 seconds = 6.529 FPS
30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.791 FPS
29 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.595 FPS
33 frames in 5.2 seconds = 6.305 FPS
105 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.984 FPS<= pressing ESC; Launcher slowly closes
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.799 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.998 FPS
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.599 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.996 FPS
Everything seems to be very slow when Launcher is open and comes back to
normal after Launcher is closed.
Replacing compiz windows:
-->compiz --replace
- -->glxgears
+ -->glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
303 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.494 FPS<= Launcher closed
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.598 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.797 FPS
291 frames in 5.0 seconds = 58.199 FPS<= pressing “Super”; Launcher quickly opens
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.799 FPS
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.515 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.679 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.999 FPS<= pressing ESC; Launcher quickly closes
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.798 FPS
297 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.315 FPS
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.395 FPS
297 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.399 FPS<= pressing “Super”; Launcher quickly opens
296 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.089 FPS
This will work good for some time (10 maybe 20 minutes) and will go back
to degraded performance again.
** Description changed:
When resume from suspend the desktop loads but Unity runs very slow.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Info:
-->lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release: 12.04
Codename: precise
-->uname -a
Linux myBox 3.2.0-24-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Mon May 21 16:52:17 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
-->apt-cache policy unity
unity:
Installed: 5.12-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 5.12-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 5.12-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
5.10.0-0ubuntu6 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages
-->apt-cache policy compiz
compiz:
Installed: 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1:0.9.7.6-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages
-->dpkg -s Xorg | grep Version
Version: 1:7.6+12ubuntu1
-->glxinfo | grep OpenGL
OpenGL vendor string: X.Org
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER
OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 8.0.2
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20
-->lspci -nn | grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Juniper [Radeon HD 5700 Series] [1002:68b8]
Hardware
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4P
Processor: Intel Core i7-870 Processor
Graphics: Gigabyte ATI Radeon HD 5770 GV-R577UD-1GD (Batmobile)
Memory: 16GB (4 x 4GB) G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) F3-12800CL9D-8GBRL
SSD Drive: Crucial 64GB m4 2.5-inch SATA 6GB/s
Monitor: 2x Samsung P2770
Discussion link:
- http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=11967277
+ http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=11962793#post11962793
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Fresh boot; before suspend
-->glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
303 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.440 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.968 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.966 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.970 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.967 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.968 FPS
After suspend
-->glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
188 frames in 5.0 seconds = 37.560 FPS
194 frames in 5.0 seconds = 38.670 FPS
196 frames in 5.0 seconds = 39.068 FPS
198 frames in 5.0 seconds = 39.599 FPS
201 frames in 5.0 seconds = 40.198 FPS
200 frames in 5.0 seconds = 39.868 FPS
After compiz --replace
-->glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
303 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.457 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.797 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.997 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.999 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.998 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.998 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.998 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.798 FPS
It doesn't look like it is only affecting Launcher performance when
suspend was used. I'm not sure if this would be a separate issue so
decided to include it here for now. Here is some more details.
Fresh boot; suspend not used
At first all looks good. Launcher opens and closes quickly but after few minutes of regular use I can see performance degradation when using Launcher. Everything else still works good.
-->glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
302 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.245 FPS<= Launcher closed
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.798 FPS
301 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.002 FPS
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.596 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.799 FPS
102 frames in 5.1 seconds = 20.030 FPS<= pressing “Super”; Launcher slowly opens
30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.780 FPS
30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.759 FPS
30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.780 FPS
31 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.962 FPS
32 frames in 5.2 seconds = 6.172 FPS
31 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.984 FPS
30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.788 FPS
105 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.984 FPS<= pressing ESC; Launcher slowly closes
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.600 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.600 FPS
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.595 FPS
301 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.001 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.996 FPS
293 frames in 5.0 seconds = 58.597 FPS
49 frames in 5.2 seconds = 9.438 FPS<= pressing “Super”; Launcher slowly opens
31 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.961 FPS
34 frames in 5.2 seconds = 6.529 FPS
30 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.791 FPS
29 frames in 5.2 seconds = 5.595 FPS
33 frames in 5.2 seconds = 6.305 FPS
105 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.984 FPS<= pressing ESC; Launcher slowly closes
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.799 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.998 FPS
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.599 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.996 FPS
Everything seems to be very slow when Launcher is open and comes back to
normal after Launcher is closed.
Replacing compiz windows:
-->compiz --replace
-->glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
303 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.494 FPS<= Launcher closed
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.598 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.797 FPS
291 frames in 5.0 seconds = 58.199 FPS<= pressing “Super”; Launcher quickly opens
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.799 FPS
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.515 FPS
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.679 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.999 FPS<= pressing ESC; Launcher quickly closes
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.798 FPS
297 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.315 FPS
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.395 FPS
297 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.399 FPS<= pressing “Super”; Launcher quickly opens
296 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.089 FPS
This will work good for some time (10 maybe 20 minutes) and will go back
to degraded performance again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004475
Title:
Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1004475/+subscriptions
Follow ups
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow graphics after resume from suspend
From: Wa Dev, 2015-06-08
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow graphics after resume from suspend
From: vellamike, 2014-02-05
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow graphics after resume from suspend
From: nozyczek, 2013-01-12
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow graphics after resume from suspend
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-01-12
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow graphics after resume from suspend
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-01-12
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow graphics after resume from suspend
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-01-12
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow graphics after resume from suspend
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-13
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: Mohan K, 2012-11-12
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: Eduardox123, 2012-11-10
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: Greg Michalec, 2012-09-28
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-09-10
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-09-10
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: Greg Michalec, 2012-09-07
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: Bilal Akhtar, 2012-07-06
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: SalsaDoom, 2012-06-14
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: nozyczek, 2012-06-13
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: gutigen, 2012-06-13
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: nozyczek, 2012-06-13
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: nozyczek, 2012-06-13
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: gutigen, 2012-06-13
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: SalsaDoom, 2012-06-13
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: SalsaDoom, 2012-06-13
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: Gutigen, 2012-06-12
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: nozyczek, 2012-06-12
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: Gutigen, 2012-06-12
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: nozyczek, 2012-06-12
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: Gutigen, 2012-06-12
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: SalsaDoom, 2012-06-12
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: Gutigen, 2012-06-12
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: melrokz, 2012-06-01
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: nozyczek, 2012-05-26
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-05-25
-
[Bug 1004475] Re: Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: nozyczek, 2012-05-25
-
[Bug 1004475] [NEW] Slow Launcher after resume from suspend
From: nozyczek, 2012-05-25
References