compiz team mailing list archive
-
compiz team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #43881
[Bug 1097649] [NEW] Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
Public bug reported:
Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from
ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
==9349== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 753 of 1,327
==9349== at 0x4C29E46: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==9349== by 0x6E32738: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E210E4: g_closure_new_simple (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E227BD: g_signal_type_cclosure_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E37027: g_signal_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E26A88: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E40925: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E405BE: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E28ECC: g_object_new_valist (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E29373: g_object_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0xB1E24F8: ccsGSettingsWrapperNewForSchema (ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184)
==9349== by 0xAFCF5FF: initBackend (gsettings.c:468)
==9349==
==9349== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 754 of 1,327
==9349== at 0x4C29E46: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==9349== by 0x6E32738: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E210E4: g_closure_new_simple (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E227BD: g_signal_type_cclosure_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E37027: g_signal_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0xB492226: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E40925: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E28ECC: g_object_new_valist (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E29373: g_object_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0xB1E24F8: ccsGSettingsWrapperNewForSchema (ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184)
==9349== by 0xAFCF5FF: initBackend (gsettings.c:468)
==9349== by 0xA316D4A: ccsSetBackendDefault (main.c:1268)
==9349==
==9349== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 755 of 1,327
==9349== at 0x4C29E46: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==9349== by 0x6E32738: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E210E4: g_closure_new_simple (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E227BD: g_signal_type_cclosure_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E37027: g_signal_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0xB492284: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E40925: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E28ECC: g_object_new_valist (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E29373: g_object_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0xB1E24F8: ccsGSettingsWrapperNewForSchema (ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184)
==9349== by 0xAFCF5FF: initBackend (gsettings.c:468)
==9349== by 0xA316D4A: ccsSetBackendDefault (main.c:1268)
==9349==
==9349== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 756 of 1,327
==9349== at 0x4C29E46: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==9349== by 0x6E32738: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E210E4: g_closure_new_simple (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E227BD: g_signal_type_cclosure_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E37027: g_signal_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0xB4922CE: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E40925: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E28ECC: g_object_new_valist (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E29373: g_object_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0xB1E24F8: ccsGSettingsWrapperNewForSchema (ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184)
==9349== by 0xAFCF5FF: initBackend (gsettings.c:468)
==9349== by 0xA316D4A: ccsSetBackendDefault (main.c:1268)
==9349==
==9349== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 757 of 1,327
==9349== at 0x4C29E46: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==9349== by 0x6E32738: g_malloc0 (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E210E4: g_closure_new_simple (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E227BD: g_signal_type_cclosure_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E37027: g_signal_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0xB49231C: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E40925: g_type_class_ref (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E28ECC: g_object_new_valist (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0x7E29373: g_object_new (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0.3400.1)
==9349== by 0xB1E24F8: ccsGSettingsWrapperNewForSchema (ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184)
==9349== by 0xAFCF5FF: initBackend (gsettings.c:468)
==9349== by 0xA316D4A: ccsSetBackendDefault (main.c:1268)
==9349==
** Affects: compiz
Importance: Medium
Status: Triaged
** Affects: compiz/0.9.8
Importance: Medium
Status: Triaged
** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Status: Triaged
** Tags: leak
** Also affects: compiz/0.9.8
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: compiz/0.9.8
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: compiz/0.9.8
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Also affects: compiz (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of compiz
packagers, which is subscribed to compiz in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097649
Title:
Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from
ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1097649/+subscriptions
Follow ups
-
[Bug 1097649] Re: Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
From: Stephen M. Webb, 2014-11-18
-
[Bug 1097649] Re: Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
-
[Bug 1097649] Re: Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-22
-
[Bug 1097649] Re: Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-22
-
[Bug 1097649] Re: Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-01-21
-
[Bug 1097649] Re: Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-18
-
[Bug 1097649] Re: Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
From: PS Jenkins bot, 2013-01-18
-
[Bug 1097649] Re: Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-17
-
[Bug 1097649] Re: Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-01-17
-
[Bug 1097649] Re: Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-15
-
[Bug 1097649] Re: Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
From: Sam Spilsbury, 2013-01-11
-
[Bug 1097649] Re: Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
From: Sam Spilsbury, 2013-01-11
-
[Bug 1097649] [NEW] Several leaks in g_settings_new() [g_object_new()] from ccsGSettingsNewNoPath() [ccs_gsettings_interface_wrapper.c:184]
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-09
References