← Back to team overview
compiz team mailing list archive
Thread
Date
compiz team
Mailing list archive
Messages by thread
Messages by thread
Messages sent to the compiz mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.
200 of 57974 messages, page
33
|
34
|
35
|
36
|
37
| 38 |
39
|
40
|
41
|
42
|
43
Last
•
Next
•
Previous
•
First
[Bug 1082265] Re: KDE Appmenu doesn't work with compiz decorators
,
(continued)
[Bug 1082265] Re: KDE Appmenu doesn't work with compiz decorators
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1084096] Re: When building with xorg-gtest, cmake fails to find xorg-gtest sources
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-29
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1084096] Re: When building with xorg-gtest, cmake fails to find xorg-gtest sources
From: PS Jenkins bot, 2012-11-29
[Bug 1084096] Re: When building with xorg-gtest, cmake fails to find xorg-gtest sources
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-29
[Bug 1084096] Re: When building with xorg-gtest, cmake fails to find xorg-gtest sources
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1084096] Re: When building with xorg-gtest, cmake fails to find xorg-gtest sources
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1084162] Re: unity build fails if compiz is installed outside /usr
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-29
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1084162] Re: unity build fails if compiz is installed outside /usr
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-29
[Bug 1084162] Re: unity build fails if compiz is installed outside /usr
From: PS Jenkins bot, 2012-11-29
[Bug 1084162] Re: unity build fails if compiz is installed outside /usr
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-29
[Bug 1084162] Re: unity build fails if compiz is installed outside /usr
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1084162] Re: unity build fails if compiz is installed outside /usr
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1084162] Re: unity build fails if compiz is installed outside /usr
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-03-26
[Bug 1069536] Re: Fullscreen windows at lower than native resolution only show upper left corner
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-28
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1069536] Re: Fullscreen windows at lower than native resolution only show upper left corner
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-23
[Bug 1069536] Re: Fullscreen windows at lower than native resolution only show upper left corner
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-04-03
[Bug 1069536] Re: Fullscreen windows at lower than native resolution only show upper left corner
From: Sam Spilsbury, 2013-07-22
[Bug 1069536] Re: Fullscreen windows at lower than native resolution only show upper left corner
From: MC Return, 2013-07-24
[Bug 1069536] [NEW] Fullscreen windows at lower than native resolution only show upper left corner
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-11-28
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-27
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Sean Feole, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Sean Feole, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-28
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Silviu C., 2012-12-02
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Alistair Buxton, 2012-12-02
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-12-03
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Alistair Buxton, 2012-12-03
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Alistair Buxton, 2012-12-03
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Alistair Buxton, 2012-12-03
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-12-03
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Alistair Buxton, 2012-12-03
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-12-04
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Alistair Buxton, 2012-12-04
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Alistair Buxton, 2012-12-04
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1049214] Re: [nvidia] XSync usage is a massive bottlenecking factor (nvidia performance regression in Compiz 0.9.8+)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1025586] Re: [0.9.8 r3110 regression] [LLVMpipe] Dragging windows around is much slower with compiz 0.9.8 than 0.9.7 (using LLVMpipe)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-27
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1025586] Re: [0.9.8 r3110 regression] [LLVMpipe] Dragging windows around is much slower with compiz 0.9.8 than 0.9.7 (using LLVMpipe)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1025586] Re: [0.9.8 r3110 regression] [LLVMpipe] Dragging windows around is much slower with compiz 0.9.8 than 0.9.7 (using LLVMpipe)
From: Sean Feole, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1025586] Re: [0.9.8 r3110 regression] [LLVMpipe] Dragging windows around is much slower with compiz 0.9.8 than 0.9.7 (using LLVMpipe)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-28
[Bug 1025586] Re: [0.9.8 r3110 regression] [LLVMpipe] Dragging windows around is much slower with compiz 0.9.8 than 0.9.7 (using LLVMpipe)
From: Alex Heusingfeld, 2012-12-04
[Bug 1025586] Re: [0.9.8 r3110 regression] [LLVMpipe] Dragging windows around is much slower with compiz 0.9.8 than 0.9.7 (using LLVMpipe)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1025586] Re: [0.9.8 r3110 regression] [LLVMpipe] Dragging windows around is much slower with compiz 0.9.8 than 0.9.7 (using LLVMpipe)
From: Danial Bulloch, 2012-12-27
[Bug 1025586] Re: [0.9.8 r3110 regression] [LLVMpipe] Dragging windows around is much slower with compiz 0.9.8 than 0.9.7 (using LLVMpipe)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-23
[Bug 1025586] Re: [0.9.8 r3110 regression] [LLVMpipe] Dragging windows around is much slower with compiz 0.9.8 than 0.9.7 (using LLVMpipe)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-04-03
[Bug 1025586] Re: [0.9.8 r3110 regression] [LLVMpipe] Dragging windows around is much slower with compiz 0.9.8 than 0.9.7 (using LLVMpipe)
From: Sam Spilsbury, 2013-07-22
[Bug 1025586] Re: [0.9.8 r3110 regression] [LLVMpipe] Dragging windows around is much slower with compiz 0.9.8 than 0.9.7 (using LLVMpipe)
From: MC Return, 2013-07-24
[Bug 1083132] Re: only wallpaper show on clean install (ati rs200)
From: Timo Aaltonen, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1083132] Re: only wallpaper show on clean install (ati rs200)
From: sordoman, 2012-11-26
[Bug 1083132] Re: only wallpaper show on clean install (ati rs200)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1083132] Re: only wallpaper show on clean install (ati rs200)
From: sordoman, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1083132] Re: only wallpaper show on clean install (ati rs200)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-28
[Bug 1083132] [NEW] only wallpaper show on clean install (ati rs200)
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-11-26
[Bug 1065814] Re: compiz crashes with SIGSEGV in ccsGNOMEIntegrationInitializeIntegratedSettingsList [ccs_gnome_integration_constants.c:170]
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1065814] Re: compiz crashes with SIGSEGV in ccsGNOMEIntegrationInitializeIntegratedSettingsList [ccs_gnome_integration_constants.c:170]
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1065814] Re: compiz crashes with SIGSEGV in ccsGNOMEIntegrationInitializeIntegratedSettingsList [ccs_gnome_integration_constants.c:170]
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1082152] Re: compiz 0.9.8.6 fails to build from source in KDE4-window-decorator with latest KDE 4.10 beta
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1082152] Re: compiz 0.9.8.6 fails to build from source in KDE4-window-decorator with latest KDE 4.10 beta
From: PS Jenkins bot, 2012-11-26
[Bug 1082152] Re: compiz 0.9.8.6 fails to build from source in KDE4-window-decorator with latest KDE 4.10 beta
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
[Bug 1082152] Re: compiz 0.9.8.6 fails to build from source in KDE4-window-decorator with latest KDE 4.10 beta
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1082152] Re: compiz 0.9.8.6 fails to build from source in KDE4-window-decorator with latest KDE 4.10 beta
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1082152] Re: compiz 0.9.8.6 fails to build from source in KDE4-window-decorator with latest KDE 4.10 beta
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1082152] Re: compiz 0.9.8.6 fails to build from source in KDE4-window-decorator with latest KDE 4.10 beta
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-01-11
[Bug 1082152] Re: compiz 0.9.8.6 fails to build from source in KDE4-window-decorator with latest KDE 4.10 beta
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1082152] Re: compiz 0.9.8.6 fails to build from source in KDE4-window-decorator with latest KDE 4.10 beta
From: megabaks, 2013-02-10
[Bug 1082152] Re: compiz 0.9.8.6 fails to build from source in KDE4-window-decorator with latest KDE 4.10 beta
From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2013-03-06
[Bug 1082152] Re: compiz 0.9.8.6 fails to build from source in KDE4-window-decorator with latest KDE 4.10 beta
From: Didier Roche, 2013-04-03
[Bug 1082152] Re: compiz 0.9.8.6 fails to build from source in KDE4-window-decorator with latest KDE 4.10 beta
From: Brian Murray, 2013-05-21
Re: [Bug 1082152] Re: compiz 0.9.8.6 fails to build from source in KDE4-window-decorator with latest KDE 4.10 beta
From: Mjules, 2013-05-22
[Bug 1082152] Re: compiz 0.9.8.6 fails to build from source in KDE4-window-decorator with latest KDE 4.10 beta
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-05-21
[Bug 1068503] Re: scaleaddon: Draw Window Highlight is a solid white rectangle. No transparency.
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1068503] Re: scaleaddon: Draw Window Highlight is a solid white rectangle. No transparency.
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1070233] Re: Resizeinfo Plug-in: Gradient color 2 and 3 settings are ignored and no background gradient is rendered
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1070233] Re: Resizeinfo Plug-in: Gradient color 2 and 3 settings are ignored and no background gradient is rendered
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1070233] Re: Resizeinfo Plug-in: Gradient color 2 and 3 settings are ignored and no background gradient is rendered
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1070297] Re: Resizeinfo Plug-in: No possibility to change the color and transparency of the rounded background outline
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1070297] Re: Resizeinfo Plug-in: No possibility to change the color and transparency of the rounded background outline
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1070297] Re: Resizeinfo Plug-in: No possibility to change the color and transparency of the rounded background outline
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1075584] Re: Workspacenames Plug-in: Wishlist: No default values for workspacenames, should be changed
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1075584] Re: Workspacenames Plug-in: Wishlist: No default values for workspacenames, should be changed
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1075584] Re: Workspacenames Plug-in: Wishlist: No default values for workspacenames, should be changed
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1075600] Re: Workspacenames Plug-in: Wishlist: Default Appearance values not ideal
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1075600] Re: Workspacenames Plug-in: Wishlist: Default Appearance values not ideal
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1075600] Re: Workspacenames Plug-in: Wishlist: Default Appearance values not ideal
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1076876] Re: 100_expo_layout.patch does not apply totally cleanly
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1076876] Re: 100_expo_layout.patch does not apply totally cleanly
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1076876] Re: 100_expo_layout.patch does not apply totally cleanly
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1077823] Re: gtk-window-decorator: decorator.c : a small typo error
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1077823] Re: gtk-window-decorator: decorator.c : a small typo error
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1009999] Re: Shift Switcher: Window title display settings partially ignored
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1009999] Re: Shift Switcher: Window title display settings partially ignored
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1009999] Re: Shift Switcher: Window title display settings partially ignored
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1009999] Re: Shift Switcher: Window title display settings partially ignored
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-03-26
[Bug 1009999] Re: Shift Switcher: Window title display settings partially ignored
From: MC Return, 2013-07-21
[Bug 1033877] Re: Member variables that are not initialized in the constructors reported by cppcheck
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1033877] Re: Member variables that are not initialized in the constructors reported by cppcheck
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1033877] Re: Member variables that are not initialized in the constructors reported by cppcheck
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1048272] Re: [regression][GLES]: Cube plugin: Transparency for top and bottom faces broken
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1048272] Re: [regression][GLES]: Cube plugin: Transparency for top and bottom faces broken
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1048272] Re: [regression][GLES]: Cube plugin: Transparency for top and bottom faces broken
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1048272] Re: [regression][GLES]: Cube plugin: Transparency for top and bottom faces broken
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1048272] Re: [regression][GLES]: Cube plugin: Transparency for top and bottom faces broken
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1048272] Re: [regression][GLES]: Cube plugin: Transparency for top and bottom faces broken
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-01-11
[Bug 1048272] Re: [regression][GLES]: Cube plugin: Transparency for top and bottom faces broken
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1048272] Re: [regression][GLES]: Cube plugin: Transparency for top and bottom faces broken
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-02-27
[Bug 1048272] Re: [regression][GLES]: Cube plugin: Transparency for top and bottom faces broken
From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2013-03-06
[Bug 1048272] Re: [regression][GLES]: Cube plugin: Transparency for top and bottom faces broken
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-03-26
[Bug 1048272] Re: [regression][GLES]: Cube plugin: Transparency for top and bottom faces broken
From: Didier Roche, 2013-04-03
[Bug 1048272] Re: [regression][GLES]: Cube plugin: Transparency for top and bottom faces broken
From: Brian Murray, 2013-05-21
[Bug 1048272] Re: [regression][GLES]: Cube plugin: Transparency for top and bottom faces broken
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-05-21
[Bug 1064791] Re: Redundant writes to plugins-with-set-keys
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1064791] Re: Redundant writes to plugins-with-set-keys
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1064791] Re: Redundant writes to plugins-with-set-keys
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1066823] Re: Editors like gedit and others will not recognize *.xml.in files as xml, so if opened there is no syntax highlighting making those files harder to read.
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1066823] Re: Editors like gedit and others will not recognize *.xml.in files as xml, so if opened there is no syntax highlighting making those files harder to read.
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1066823] Re: Editors like gedit and others will not recognize *.xml.in files as xml, so if opened there is no syntax highlighting making those files harder to read.
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1066823] Re: Editors like gedit and others will not recognize *.xml.in files as xml, so if opened there is no syntax highlighting making those files harder to read.
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-03-26
[Bug 1066823] Re: Editors like gedit and others will not recognize *.xml.in files as xml, so if opened there is no syntax highlighting making those files harder to read.
From: Stephen M. Webb, 2013-04-03
[Bug 1067234] Re: Duplicate file: include/core/point.h == src/point/include/core/point.h
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1067234] Re: Duplicate file: include/core/point.h == src/point/include/core/point.h
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1067234] Re: Duplicate file: include/core/point.h == src/point/include/core/point.h
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1078330] Re: It is possible to write to a plugin in compizconfig that has no associated gsettings schema
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1078330] Re: It is possible to write to a plugin in compizconfig that has no associated gsettings schema
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1078330] Re: It is possible to write to a plugin in compizconfig that has no associated gsettings schema
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1080555] Re: Tests 1-4 fail with SEGFAULT: CompizConfigPython.test_* (SEGFAULT)...
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1080555] Re: Tests 1-4 fail with SEGFAULT: CompizConfigPython.test_* (SEGFAULT)...
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1080555] Re: Tests 1-4 fail with SEGFAULT: CompizConfigPython.test_* (SEGFAULT)...
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1070817] Re: make test fails in CompizConfigPython.test_* (OTHER_FAULT)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1070817] Re: make test fails in CompizConfigPython.test_* (OTHER_FAULT)
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1070817] Re: make test fails in CompizConfigPython.test_* (OTHER_FAULT)
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1075048] Re: lp:compiz r3447 FTBFS: compizconfig_test_ccs_object.cpp:123:9: error: expression result unused [-Werror,-Wunused-value] GET_INTERFACE (Dummy2Interface, to);
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1075048] Re: lp:compiz r3447 FTBFS: compizconfig_test_ccs_object.cpp:123:9: error: expression result unused [-Werror,-Wunused-value] GET_INTERFACE (Dummy2Interface, to);
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1075048] Re: lp:compiz r3447 FTBFS: compizconfig_test_ccs_object.cpp:123:9: error: expression result unused [-Werror,-Wunused-value] GET_INTERFACE (Dummy2Interface, to);
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1077787] Re: CompizConfigPython tests not using ini backend
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1077787] Re: CompizConfigPython tests not using ini backend
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1077787] Re: CompizConfigPython tests not using ini backend
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1077866] Re: untest fails to link with binutils-gold
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1077866] Re: untest fails to link with binutils-gold
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1077866] Re: untest fails to link with binutils-gold
From: Alberts Muktupāvels, 2019-02-13
[Bug 1067219] Re: std::vector<CompRect, std::allocator<CompRect> > is duplicated in 2 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1067219] Re: std::vector<CompRect, std::allocator<CompRect> > is duplicated in 2 plugins
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1067219] Re: std::vector<CompRect, std::allocator<CompRect> > is duplicated in 2 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1060708] Re: Redundant check for libcompizconfig_internal in compizconfig gsettings tests
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1060708] Re: Redundant check for libcompizconfig_internal in compizconfig gsettings tests
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1060804] Re: Compiz can't build with clang
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1060804] Re: Compiz can't build with clang
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1060804] Re: Compiz can't build with clang
From: Stephen M. Webb, 2013-10-13
[Bug 1060804] Re: Compiz can't build with clang
From: Alberts Muktupāvels, 2019-02-13
[Bug 1066793] Re: std::vector<CompOption, std::allocator<CompOption> > is duplicated in 63 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1066793] Re: std::vector<CompOption, std::allocator<CompOption> > is duplicated in 63 plugins
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1066793] Re: std::vector<CompOption, std::allocator<CompOption> > is duplicated in 63 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1066793] Re: std::vector<CompOption, std::allocator<CompOption> > is duplicated in 63 plugins
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-03-26
[Bug 1066793] Re: std::vector<CompOption, std::allocator<CompOption> > is duplicated in 63 plugins
From: Stephen M. Webb, 2013-10-13
[Bug 1066795] Re: WrapableInterface<GLScreen, GLScreenInterface> is duplicated in 38 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1066795] Re: WrapableInterface<GLScreen, GLScreenInterface> is duplicated in 38 plugins
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1066795] Re: WrapableInterface<GLScreen, GLScreenInterface> is duplicated in 38 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1066796] Re: WrapableInterface<CompScreen, ScreenInterface> is duplicated in 56 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1066796] Re: WrapableInterface<CompScreen, ScreenInterface> is duplicated in 56 plugins
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1066796] Re: WrapableInterface<CompScreen, ScreenInterface> is duplicated in 56 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1066798] Re: WrapableInterface<GLWindow, GLWindowInterface> is duplicated in 31 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1066798] Re: WrapableInterface<GLWindow, GLWindowInterface> is duplicated in 31 plugins
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1066798] Re: WrapableInterface<GLWindow, GLWindowInterface> is duplicated in 31 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1066799] Re: WrapableInterface<CompWindow, WindowInterface> is duplicated in 26 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1066799] Re: WrapableInterface<CompWindow, WindowInterface> is duplicated in 26 plugins
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1066799] Re: WrapableInterface<CompWindow, WindowInterface> is duplicated in 26 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1066803] Re: std::vector<CompOption::Value, std::allocator<CompOption::Value> > is duplicated in 6 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1066803] Re: std::vector<CompOption::Value, std::allocator<CompOption::Value> > is duplicated in 6 plugins
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1066803] Re: std::vector<CompOption::Value, std::allocator<CompOption::Value> > is duplicated in 6 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1066803] Re: std::vector<CompOption::Value, std::allocator<CompOption::Value> > is duplicated in 6 plugins
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-03-26
[Bug 1066803] Re: std::vector<CompOption::Value, std::allocator<CompOption::Value> > is duplicated in 6 plugins
From: Stephen M. Webb, 2013-10-13
[Bug 1066804] Re: WrapableInterface<CompositeScreen, CompositeScreenInterface> is duplicated in 37 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1066804] Re: WrapableInterface<CompositeScreen, CompositeScreenInterface> is duplicated in 37 plugins
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1066804] Re: WrapableInterface<CompositeScreen, CompositeScreenInterface> is duplicated in 37 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1066805] Re: WrapableInterface<CompositeWindow, CompositeWindowInterface> is duplicated in 15 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1066805] Re: WrapableInterface<CompositeWindow, CompositeWindowInterface> is duplicated in 15 plugins
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1066805] Re: WrapableInterface<CompositeWindow, CompositeWindowInterface> is duplicated in 15 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1067218] Re: std::vector<CompRegion, std::allocator<CompRegion> > is duplicated in 2 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1067218] Re: std::vector<CompRegion, std::allocator<CompRegion> > is duplicated in 2 plugins
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1067218] Re: std::vector<CompRegion, std::allocator<CompRegion> > is duplicated in 2 plugins
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1033879] Re: Memory leak in decorator reported by cppcheck
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1033879] Re: Memory leak in decorator reported by cppcheck
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1033879] Re: Memory leak in decorator reported by cppcheck
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1033879] Re: Memory leak in decorator reported by cppcheck
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1033879] Re: Memory leak in decorator reported by cppcheck
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-01-11
[Bug 1033879] Re: Memory leak in decorator reported by cppcheck
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2013-01-24
[Bug 1033879] Re: Memory leak in decorator reported by cppcheck
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-02-27
[Bug 1033879] Re: Memory leak in decorator reported by cppcheck
From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2013-03-06
[Bug 1033879] Re: Memory leak in decorator reported by cppcheck
From: Didier Roche, 2013-04-03
[Bug 1033879] Re: Memory leak in decorator reported by cppcheck
From: Brian Murray, 2013-05-21
[Bug 1033879] Re: Memory leak in decorator reported by cppcheck
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-05-21
[Bug 1033879] Re: Memory leak in decorator reported by cppcheck
From: Stephen M. Webb, 2014-11-25
[Bug 1033879] Re: Memory leak in decorator reported by cppcheck
From: Mathew Hodson, 2014-12-09
[Bug 1042132] Re: [GLES] Regression: Text background rendering broken - black rectangle instead of rectangle with rounded edges and transparency is drawn
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-26
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1042132] Re: [GLES] Regression: Text background rendering broken - black rectangle instead of rectangle with rounded edges and transparency is drawn
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1042132] Re: [GLES] Regression: Text background rendering broken - black rectangle instead of rectangle with rounded edges and transparency is drawn
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2012-11-27
[Bug 1042132] Re: [GLES] Regression: Text background rendering broken - black rectangle instead of rectangle with rounded edges and transparency is drawn
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-12-05
[Bug 1042132] Re: [GLES] Regression: Text background rendering broken - black rectangle instead of rectangle with rounded edges and transparency is drawn
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-01-11
200 of 57974 messages, page
33
|
34
|
35
|
36
|
37
| 38 |
39
|
40
|
41
|
42
|
43
Last
•
Next
•
Previous
•
First