context team mailing list archive

[Mojca Miklavec <mojca.miklavec.lists@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:15, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 09:03 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>> (from the ConTeXt mailing list: problem with beta for linux-64; about
>> missing executable bit of luatex)
>>
>>> Strange, I do always:  cd ~/minimals&&  svn up&&  ./do_all.sh
>>> I'll take a look at it...
>>
>> There is (in bin_commit.sh):
>>
>> svn add -q "$BINS/luatex/$ver_new_luatex"
>> svn add -q "$BINS/luatex/$ver_new_luatex/luatex"
>> svn delete "$BINS/luatex/current/luatex"
>> svn cp     "$BINS/luatex/$ver_new_luatex/luatex" "$BINS/luatex/current/"
>>
>> If luatex/current doesn't get the executable bit set, my only
>> explanation is then that the last line forgets to copy the executable
>> bit along.
>>
>> I can set it explicitely once again, but I would nevertheless like to
>> know what is going on. (I have fixed it now in repository, but it is
>> going to repeat next time if I don't fix the building scripts.)
>
> You have to set the executable bit in SVN, I think.
>
>  $ svn propset svn:executable ON luatex

I know that. But "svn cp" should copy the executable bit along,
shouldn't it? It works in other platforms, it works as a separate test
on Peter's machine.

We both agreed to wait for the next version of luatex and see what
happens, double-checking if the bit is still executable at the end.

Mojca