cuneiform team mailing list archive

[Dmitrijs Ledkovs <dmitrij.ledkov@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 22 April 2010 00:26, JussiP <jpakkane@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The only people who can tell for sure are Cognitive developers. I have
> been thinking of nuking the files altogether because they are not used
> for anything and probably no longer even work.
>

Aha =) thanks. Well I'll nuke those & repackage the tarball.

While you are at that why don't you nuke
cuneiform_src/Kern/icrashreport as well.

Or is that still used / working?

-- 
license details about Addfiles
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568137
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Cuneiform
Linux, which is the registrant for Cuneiform for Linux.

Status in Linux port of Cuneiform: New

Bug description:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jpakkane/cuneiform-linux/trunk/files/head:/cuneiform_src/Addfiles

license.txt states a BSD 3 Clause lecese. But the files under API_PUMA directory do not have copyright information stated in the headers/comments.

As far as I understand this is windows-target specific files. Are these files covered by the cuneform_src/Addfiles/license.txt? If yes they should have similar BSD clause in the headers.

I'm working on getting the 0.9 into debian & ubuntu. Previously this directory was excluded from the tarball as distributed by Debian source package.