curtin-dev team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: [Merge] ~dbungert/curtin:kernel-remove-better-oem into curtin:master

To: mp+470067@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Michael Hudson-Doyle <mp+470067@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:00:49 -0000
In-reply-to: <172186286091.2343993.4978391751251320912.launchpad@scripts-bzrsyncd.lp.internal>
Reply-to: mp+470067@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

After about half an hour of intense discussion I am persuaded that the logic change makes sense but I think the option names do not really. Do we have any cases where subiquity will pass remove but not remove_existing? (in the state we want to end up in, never mind what is happening as things change)
-- 
https://code.launchpad.net/~dbungert/curtin/+git/curtin/+merge/470067
Your team curtin developers is requested to review the proposed merge of ~dbungert/curtin:kernel-remove-better-oem into curtin:master.

References

[Merge] ~dbungert/curtin:kernel-remove-better-oem into curtin:master
From: Dan Bungert, 2024-07-24