curtin-dev team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: [Merge] ~dbungert/curtin:kernel-remove-better-oem into curtin:master

To: mp+470067@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Dan Bungert <mp+470067@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:08:54 -0000
In-reply-to: <172186286091.2343993.4978391751251320912.launchpad@scripts-bzrsyncd.lp.internal>
Reply-to: mp+470067@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Do we have any cases where subiquity will pass remove but not remove_existing? 

In my Subiquity proposal, remove_existing is used in all cases excluding OEM.  In the OEM kernel case, since we want to preserve that OEM kernel, it manages that more directly by way of what is currently called the remove list.
-- 
https://code.launchpad.net/~dbungert/curtin/+git/curtin/+merge/470067
Your team curtin developers is requested to review the proposed merge of ~dbungert/curtin:kernel-remove-better-oem into curtin:master.

References

[Merge] ~dbungert/curtin:kernel-remove-better-oem into curtin:master
From: Dan Bungert, 2024-07-24