← Back to team overview

dbusmenu-list team mailing list archive

Re: LayoutUpdate vs ChildrenUpdated

 

On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 11:21 +0100, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Naming signals using past tense of verbs looks better IMO and is more
> consistent with the other signals (ItemUpdated and ItemPropertyUpdated).
> I still believe the revision is useless, but I am willing to compromise,
> so what about adopting: "ChildrenUpdated(int revision, uint parentId)"
> or "LayoutUpdated(int revision, uint parentId)"?

I'd prefer LayoutUpdated as it may include more than just the direct
descendants.  For instance, GrandChildren could get updated as well :)

		--Ted
 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Follow ups

References