dbusmenu-list team mailing list archive
-
dbusmenu-list team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00014
Re: Proposal for aboutToShow() implementation
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 18:16 +0100, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Ted Gould wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 10:12 +0100, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> >> Ted Gould wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:13 +0100, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> >>>> Since we introduce a new method, getting the result from the return
> >>>> value rather than waiting for a signal feel more efficient.
> >>> But, if we implemented the event mask that we had discussed (I don't
> >>> think anyone has implemented it) then we would know whether a menu was
> >>> interested in the event and we should wait.
> >> I can't remember this event mask discussion. Care to refresh my fading
> >> memory?
> >
> > The idea was that we could have a property for individual items so that
> > we would know what event it was interested in. The idea was to not send
> > dbus traffic when we didn't need it. That way we would send
> > "AboutToShow" in this case if the menu didn't care.
>
> This is a good idea, but unfortunately there is no way (that I know of)
> in Qt to know whether there are slots connected to a signal, meaning no
> way for KStatusNotifierItem to know whether the app actually plans to
> update the menu when it is about to show.
Yes, but I think we should have it so that we can optimize this as we
go. I think it's an optimization we'll need, perhaps we can convince
Nokia to allow us to know when the slot is registered for at some point.
It seems rather silly that you can't query a signal.
--Ted
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Follow ups
References