desktop-packages team mailing list archive
-
desktop-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #110188
[Bug 1438494] [NEW] ghostscript fails to correctly substitute cidf fonts
Public bug reported:
I reported this bug first with ghostscript
(http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695874), but it is
apparently a packaging issue.
The general issue is that when there is a CIDF font in a .pdf that is
not embedded in the document, ghostscript will stop processing the file
at that font (see the file attached to the ghostscript bug). The
packaging issue is that CIDF fonts that are not on the system are in the
default Ubuntu cidfmap file.
System info is:
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 14.10
Release: 14.10
Codename: utopic
$ ghostscript --version
9.14
** Affects: ghostscript (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ghostscript in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1438494
Title:
ghostscript fails to correctly substitute cidf fonts
Status in ghostscript package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
I reported this bug first with ghostscript
(http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695874), but it is
apparently a packaging issue.
The general issue is that when there is a CIDF font in a .pdf that is
not embedded in the document, ghostscript will stop processing the
file at that font (see the file attached to the ghostscript bug). The
packaging issue is that CIDF fonts that are not on the system are in
the default Ubuntu cidfmap file.
System info is:
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 14.10
Release: 14.10
Codename: utopic
$ ghostscript --version
9.14
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1438494/+subscriptions
Follow ups
-
[Bug 1438494] Re: ghostscript fails to correctly substitute cidf fonts
From: Thorsten, 2015-12-11
-
[Bug 1438494] Re: ghostscript fails to correctly substitute cidf fonts
From: cliddell, 2015-12-11
-
[Bug 1438494] Re: ghostscript fails to correctly substitute cidf fonts
From: Thorsten, 2015-12-10
-
[Bug 1438494] Re: ghostscript fails to correctly substitute cidf fonts
From: cliddell, 2015-05-14
-
[Bug 1438494] Re: ghostscript fails to correctly substitute cidf fonts
From: Till Kamppeter, 2015-05-14
-
[Bug 1438494] Re: ghostscript fails to correctly substitute cidf fonts
From: Till Kamppeter, 2015-05-14
-
[Bug 1438494] Re: ghostscript fails to correctly substitute cidf fonts
From: Till Kamppeter, 2015-05-14
-
[Bug 1438494] Re: ghostscript fails to correctly substitute cidf fonts
From: cliddell, 2015-05-07
-
[Bug 1438494] Re: ghostscript fails to correctly substitute cidf fonts
From: Till Kamppeter, 2015-04-01
-
[Bug 1438494] Re: ghostscript fails to correctly substitute cidf fonts
From: cliddell, 2015-03-31
-
[Bug 1438494] [NEW] ghostscript fails to correctly substitute cidf fonts
From: Bill, 2015-03-31
References