desktop-packages team mailing list archive

[Michael Terry <michael.terry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sure, though the suitability of ~libreoffice is a separate question. I
agree that some teams aren't suitable; I have definitely rejected some
team bug subscribers because they weren't well "staffed".

And I agree that since ~desktop-packages is the point of contact for
libreoffice, it should probably also be the point of contact for this
package.

But I don't agree that the list of teams on the m-r report shouldn't
grow as a matter of course.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487148

Title:
  [MIR] fonts-stix -- to replace xfonts-mathml

Status in fonts-stix package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Availability]
  already in xenial

  
  [Rationale]
  The libreoffice-common package currently recommends xfonts-mathml, which was removed from Debian in 2014 with the rationale that it is superseded by fonts-stix (and that it has a license problem).  Please replace it with fonts-stix.

  [Security]
  no executable code

  [Quality assurance]
  no executable code

  [Dependencies]
  no further deps needed: see http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.txt

  [Standards compliance]
  trivial package, maintained by Debian

  [Maintenance]
  no executable code, maintained by Debian, stable/low frequency updates

  [Background information] 
  Since xfonts-mathml is only a Recommends: rather than Depends:, I'm going to go ahead and remove xfonts-mathml from wily.  If for some reason fonts-stix is not a suitable replacement and xfonts-mathml is still needed, please feel free to reupload it to the archive and close this bug.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-stix/+bug/1487148/+subscriptions