desktop-packages team mailing list archive

[Matthew Paul Thomas <mpt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

Third-party .deb packages -- such as Opera and Chrome -- sometimes have
their data.tar portion compressed using LZMA.

Until Ubuntu 11.10 this wasn't a problem, because the lzma package was installed by default. In 11.10, however, it was not (bug 868188).
<http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=1124872&t=1318873023&page=1#comment10564932>

To work around this problem, software-center 5.0.2 Recommends lzma.

However, as described by ruario in that bug report, "the lzma package
installs the older lzma utils, which are no longer actively maintained[.
T]he upstream maintainer of lzma utils is the same as xz utils. He
considers xz to be the replacement for lzma, which is why it is
backwards compatible".

So, apt should probably use xz-lzma, and software-center should no
longer depend on lzma. xz-utils has been in Main at least since Lucid.

** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Description changed:

  Third-party .deb packages -- such as Opera and Chrome -- sometimes have
  their data.tar portion compressed using LZMA.
  
  Until Ubuntu 11.10 this wasn't a problem, because the lzma package was installed by default. In 11.10, however, it was not (bug 868188).
  <http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=1124872&t=1318873023&page=1#comment10564932>
  
  To work around this problem, software-center 5.0.2 Recommends lzma.
  
  However, as described by ruario in that bug report, "the lzma package
  installs the older lzma utils, which are no longer actively maintained[.
  T]he upstream maintainer of lzma utils is the same as xz utils. He
  considers xz to be the replacement for lzma, which is why it is
  backwards compatible".
  
  So, apt should probably use xz-lzma, and software-center should no
- longer depend on lzma.
+ longer depend on lzma. xz-utils has been in Main at least since Lucid.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878354

Title:
  software-center dependency on lzma is suboptimal

Status in “software-center” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Third-party .deb packages -- such as Opera and Chrome -- sometimes
  have their data.tar portion compressed using LZMA.

  Until Ubuntu 11.10 this wasn't a problem, because the lzma package was installed by default. In 11.10, however, it was not (bug 868188).
  <http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=1124872&t=1318873023&page=1#comment10564932>

  To work around this problem, software-center 5.0.2 Recommends lzma.

  However, as described by ruario in that bug report, "the lzma package
  installs the older lzma utils, which are no longer actively
  maintained[. T]he upstream maintainer of lzma utils is the same as xz
  utils. He considers xz to be the replacement for lzma, which is why it
  is backwards compatible".

  So, apt should probably use xz-lzma, and software-center should no
  longer depend on lzma. xz-utils has been in Main at least since Lucid.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/878354/+subscriptions