dhis2-devs team mailing list archive
-
dhis2-devs team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #09088
Re: Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
Den 10. des. 2010 kl. 03.45 skrev Lars Helge Øverland:
> Sever side "report" recieving:
>
> - if there is an incompatible change store in a queue for admin evaluation (much like is implemented for sms now)
>
> I assume that if the dataset is incompatible it contains elements which are not mappable to current elements (not collected anymore? change in breakdown?) Just out of curiosity, do we have specific use-cases where we are interested in collecting data which is not mappable to the current metadata?
I don't know that much about the implementation side of things, so others would have to answer that one.
But, say you want to change from one month to the next which dataelements is required (we don't have that functionality for datasets [yet], but we do in the community module). Or that you want to change the type of a dataelement, or it's macdonalds stuff? Or that you just want changes to be consistent across the solution.
Since this is not about whole instances having to be manually updated, automating the workflows here would seem possible and very much desirable. The main problem is handling edge cases where the user have edited a data set before it has gotten the update from the server, and those I would think we could build in configurable support for as we go along.
I the general case it seems to me that, at least in India, change is needed from time to time (especially for new functionality being deployed), and I think it is very much an implementation issue how you need to deal with it. I guess you can always manage without incompatible changes in principle, but I'm not sure it is wise to have it as a requirement?
Also note that for mobile (for now, at least), orgunit changes would be a manual issue to handle, as the app is (for now, at least) tied to the orgunit the user is reporting for. Changing orgunit is more complex, because what dataset's (and other) to be reported can be different from orgunit to orgunit, and a more general solution would require a more complex ui and more memory and bandwith..
Jo
Follow ups
References
-
Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
From: Romain-Rolland TOHOURI, 2010-11-27
-
Re: Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
From: Jo Størset, 2010-11-27
-
Re: Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
From: Knut Staring, 2010-11-27
-
Re: Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
From: Ola Hodne Titlestad, 2010-11-27
-
Re: Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
From: Knut Staring, 2010-11-27
-
Re: Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
From: Bob Jolliffe, 2010-11-27
-
Re: Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
From: Lars Helge Øverland, 2010-11-28
-
Re: Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
From: Bob Jolliffe, 2010-11-28
-
Re: Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
From: Jo Størset, 2010-12-07
-
Re: Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
From: Bob Jolliffe, 2010-12-07
-
Re: Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
From: Jo Størset, 2010-12-09
-
Re: Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
From: Bob Jolliffe, 2010-12-09
-
Re: Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
From: Lars Helge Øverland, 2010-12-09
-
Re: Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
From: Jo Størset, 2010-12-09
-
Re: Fwd: [OPENMRS-IMPLEMENTERS] x-forms and remote formentry module
From: Lars Helge Øverland, 2010-12-09