dhis2-documenters team mailing list archive

[Lars Helge Øverland <larshelge@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Inéz,

I think it is correct. The idea is that immunization coverage
indicators are using routine reported data as numerator and population
data as the denominator. So if the data completeness (ie. reporting
rates) are very different you can't really compare counties - e.g. a
low value might imply low reporting rather than low immunization
numbers.

Lars


On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Inés Bebea <ines.bebea@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on translation of the User Implementation Guide. As I got to
> section 2.4, I get that I am not sure if the following explanation provided
> is correct:
>
> "Looking at the final column (Immuniz. Compl. %) which indicates the
> completeness of reporting of the immunisation form for the same period, we
> can see that the numbers are more or less the same in the two counties we
> compared, which tells us that the coverage rates are comparable across the
> two counties."
>
> I would think that "the completeness rates are comparable across the two
> counties" but not that "the coverage rates are..".
>
> Any suggestions? May I translate it as it is?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Inés
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-documenters
> Post to     : dhis2-documenters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-documenters
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>