dhis2-documenters team mailing list archive

[Inés Bebea <ines.bebea@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Lars. I got it! :)

2012/9/20 Lars Helge Øverland <larshelge@xxxxxxxxx>

> Hi Inéz,
>
> I think it is correct. The idea is that immunization coverage
> indicators are using routine reported data as numerator and population
> data as the denominator. So if the data completeness (ie. reporting
> rates) are very different you can't really compare counties - e.g. a
> low value might imply low reporting rather than low immunization
> numbers.
>
> Lars
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Inés Bebea <ines.bebea@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am working on translation of the User Implementation Guide. As I got to
> > section 2.4, I get that I am not sure if the following explanation
> provided
> > is correct:
> >
> > "Looking at the final column (Immuniz. Compl. %) which indicates the
> > completeness of reporting of the immunisation form for the same period,
> we
> > can see that the numbers are more or less the same in the two counties we
> > compared, which tells us that the coverage rates are comparable across
> the
> > two counties."
> >
> > I would think that "the completeness rates are comparable across the two
> > counties" but not that "the coverage rates are..".
> >
> > Any suggestions? May I translate it as it is?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Inés
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-documenters
> > Post to     : dhis2-documenters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-documenters
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
>



-- 
Inés Bebea
@bbaobabb