dhis2-users team mailing list archive

[John Ojo <jnojo@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jason,

Thank you so much for the quick response. Will look at the documentation.
Many thanks,
John


 
John Ojo MD, FMCPH

Accra, Ghana.

Mobile: +233 234691626+233 234691626
Skype:  Johnojo
Email: jnojo@xxxxxxxxx




On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 8:56 PM, Jason Pickering <jason.p.pickering@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 
Hi John,
You should probably consider using the new feature of the category option group sets. This allows a mechanism to have multiple reports for a single organisation unit and time period, which would be disaggregated by for instance, "Implementing partner" and "Project". You can take a look at the new documentation here  which describes how to set this up. 

The problem with the approach which you propose is that the maintenance of the orgunit hierarchy becomes complicated if you are dealing with a lot of IPs. If it is a small number, it may be possible, but has proven to be a big headache in other implementations where this type of information needs to be recorded. 

Best regards,
Jason




On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:21 AM, John Ojo <jnojo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi All,
>
>I am designing a database for an organization that works with multiple local NGOs (14 NGOs in all) as the Implementing Partners (IPs) for the said organization.
>
>There are 40 districts in all. For the sake of this description, I will name the districts as district_1, district_2, district_3, and so on. and the IPs as IP1, IP2, IP3, and so on.
>Each of the IPs works in multiple districts; for example IP1 and IP2 each works in all the 40 districts. 
>
>Each IP specializes in one program area. For example, IP1 does only HIV/AIDS while IP2 focuses on Gender & Human Rights.
>The organization needs to be able to know the results of each IP from each district every month.
>
>I am therefore planning to set up the organisation unit names in the DHIS 2 database as
 follows:
>For IP1 and IP2, I'm considering the following orgUnit names:
>
>District_1
>  IP1_d1 
>  IP2_d1
> 
>District_2
>  IP1_d2 
>  IP2_d2
> 
>
>
>District_3
>  IP1_d3 
>  IP2_d3
>.
>
>.
>.
>
>District_40
>  IP1_d40 
>  IP2_d40
>
>
>
>I would appreciate suggestions on how to handle this piece, especially if there's a better way than this approach and would also like to hear from anyone who had had to deal with this type of situation and how they handled the orgUnit names.
>
>
>Thank you so much.
>
>
>
>John
>
>
>John Ojo MD, FMCPH
>
>Accra, Ghana.
>
>Mobile: +233 234691626+233 234691626
>Skype:  Johnojo
>Email: jnojo@xxxxxxxxx
>
>_______________________________________________
>Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>Post to     : dhis2-devs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs
>More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>