dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00790
Re: Boundary terms in Dolfin
>> I agree that we should support both, although 2 would be the only one
>> avoiding checking (for Karin & Johan) as far as I understand.
>
> It depends on what the user wants. If someone calls
>
> FEM::applyBC(..., mesh, ...)
>
> then we have to iterate over the entire boundary. On the other hand,
> if someone calls
>
> FEM::applyBC(..., boundary, ...)
>
> then we only have to loop over that portion of the boundary.
Yes, but doesn't this involve checking if we are on the "boundary" by
comparing boundary ID's?
/Johan
Follow ups
References
-
Re: Boundary terms in Dolfin
From: Anders Logg, 2005-06-08
-
Re: Boundary terms in Dolfin
From: Karin Kraft, 2005-06-30
-
Re: Boundary terms in Dolfin
From: Anders Logg, 2005-06-30
-
Re: Boundary terms in Dolfin
From: Karin Kraft, 2005-07-07
-
Re: Boundary terms in Dolfin
From: Anders Logg, 2005-07-07
-
Re: Boundary terms in Dolfin
From: jhoffman, 2005-07-07
-
Re: Boundary terms in Dolfin
From: Robert C. Kirby, 2005-07-07
-
Re: Boundary terms in Dolfin
From: jhoffman, 2005-07-07
-
Re: Boundary terms in Dolfin
From: Anders Logg, 2005-07-07
-
Re: Boundary terms in Dolfin
From: jhoffman, 2005-07-07
-
Re: Boundary terms in Dolfin
From: Anders Logg, 2005-07-07