dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 12:09:53AM +0100, Johan Jansson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:17:23PM -0600, Anders Logg wrote:
> > Looks great.
> > 
> > Perhaps we could pick a common name for all visualization scripts that
> > we put in the demos?
> > 
> > We have used 'plotsolution.m' for many of the demos. Perhaps we could
> > use 'plotsolution.py' or 'visualize.m' for the Python demos? Or
> > something else, as long as we're consistent. I think it would be
> > helpful if a user can always expect to find a script for visualization
> > in each of the demo directories and know what to look for.
> > 
> 
> Yes, it would be good to have a single visualization function, and
> then the plotsolution.py script could just be: visualize("file.vtu")
> or something similar. I need to think about it some more, it would be
> good to avoid requiring PyDOLFIN for example.

Perhaps the read_array() function could be included directly in the
files generated by the Python format?

> > By the way, I get some errors when I try to generate the SWIG
> > interface. Something you recognize?
> > 
> 
> Ok, this is fixed now. It was a duplicate header #ifdef, so a file
> wasn't included.

ok.

/Anders