dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02098
Re: Ready for 0.6.0?
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 08:25 +0100, Johan Hoffman wrote:
> I'm fine with a release.
>
> /Johan
>
>
Me too.
Garth
>
>
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 07:43:25PM +0100, Johan Jansson wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 08:50:12AM -0600, Anders Logg wrote:
> >> > Anything else before 0.6.0?
> >> >
> >> > I will fix the XML output (closing the tags correctly) and some other
> >> > minor things. Anything else?
> >> >
> >> > Is PyDOLFIN in good shape?
> >> >
> >> > /Anders
> >> >
> >>
> >> PyDOLFIN needs some minor fixes wrt. libtool. They are ready, just not
> >> checked in. After that, PyDOLFIN is in good shape.
> >
> > Great.
> >
> >> The build system is also due for a redesign. But I guess it works ok
> >> right now, so maybe the redesign should wait until after the
> >> release. I think the design should be a flat Makefile
> >> (i.e. non-recursive), it also seems the only way to go without
> >> building intermediary libraries. We can discuss this further after the
> >> release, it doesn't seem urgent.
> >>
> >> Johan
> >
> > Yes, let's wait until after the release.
> >
> > We could also try out Matt's Python-based build system or Scons or
> > something similar and see how it compares to Autotools.
> >
> > /Anders
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> > DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.fenics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
Follow ups
References