dolfin team mailing list archive

["Garth N. Wells" <g.n.wells@xxxxxxxxxx>]

What if we move the modules (and module demos) out of the DOLFIN source 
tree and have

  src/ . . .

and

  modules/solvers/ . . .
  modules/demo/ . . .

We can give more prominence to the modules (as we've discussed before), 
and encourage people to contribute modules by promoting them more as 
"attachements" to DOLFIN.

Garth

Anders Logg wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 09:58:26PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > Sounds good. "make demo" won't necessarily work if the modules haven't 
> > been built though.
> >
> > An alternative if a configure flag --enable/disable-modules.
>
> That will have the same effect (not being able to build module demos).
>
> Perhaps we could have a flag make_module_demos, but maybe we should
> try to keep the number of targets down?
>
> /Anders
>
>
> > Garth
> >
> > Anders Logg wrote:
> > > I'm suggesting to add the following new make targets:
> > >
> > >     make modules
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > >     make modules_install
> > >
> > > As it is now, compiling the modules takes a considerable time of the
> > > build process and we have quite a number of users on Simula that
> > > are only interested in building the kernel.
> > >
> > > Any objections?
> > >
> > > /Anders
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> > > DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> > DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev