dolfin team mailing list archive

["Johan Hoffman" <jhoffman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Sounds good. I say that we go with make modules etc. and that we make
clear in documentation and welcoming message that the modules are needed
for the demos to work (possibly returning a warning when trying to make
demos without modules).

/Johan


> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 09:58:26PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>> Sounds good. "make demo" won't necessarily work if the modules haven't
been built though.
>>
>> An alternative if a configure flag --enable/disable-modules.
>
> That will have the same effect (not being able to build module demos).
>
> Perhaps we could have a flag make_module_demos, but maybe we should try
to keep the number of targets down?
>
> /Anders
>
>
>> Garth
>>
>> Anders Logg wrote:
>> > I'm suggesting to add the following new make targets:
>> >
>> >     make modules
>> >
>> > and
>> >
>> >     make modules_install
>> >
>> > As it is now, compiling the modules takes a considerable time of the
build process and we have quite a number of users on Simula that are
only interested in building the kernel.
>> >
>> > Any objections?
>> >
>> > /Anders
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > DOLFIN-dev mailing list
>> > DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
>> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
>