dolfin team mailing list archive

["Johan Hoffman" <jhoffman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> Then I think we should also have demo, test, bench at the top and just
> keep the library in src (removing kernel).

Could make sense.

> Is that a good idea?

I do not know.

> I would also not object putting the modules in a separate source tree,
> but then I'd like someone to maintain the modules (anyone from KTH?)
> with an identical release schedule as for DOLFIN and identical version
> numbers.

Wasn't that what you did not want a month back? I thought we agreed on
that it would not benefit DOLFIN to extract the modules. What Garth
suggests I think is something different, less dramatic.

/Johan


>
> /Anders
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:46:39AM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>> What if we move the modules (and module demos) out of the DOLFIN source
>> tree and have
>>
>>    src/ . . .
>>
>> and
>>
>>    modules/solvers/ . . .
>>    modules/demo/ . . .
>>
>> We can give more prominence to the modules (as we've discussed before),
>> and encourage people to contribute modules by promoting them more as
>> "attachements" to DOLFIN.
>>
>> Garth
>>
>> Anders Logg wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 09:58:26PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>> >> Sounds good. "make demo" won't necessarily work if the modules
>> haven't
>> >> been built though.
>> >>
>> >> An alternative if a configure flag --enable/disable-modules.
>> >
>> > That will have the same effect (not being able to build module demos).
>> >
>> > Perhaps we could have a flag make_module_demos, but maybe we should
>> > try to keep the number of targets down?
>> >
>> > /Anders
>> >
>> >
>> >> Garth
>> >>
>> >> Anders Logg wrote:
>> >>> I'm suggesting to add the following new make targets:
>> >>>
>> >>>     make modules
>> >>>
>> >>> and
>> >>>
>> >>>     make modules_install
>> >>>
>> >>> As it is now, compiling the modules takes a considerable time of the
>> >>> build process and we have quite a number of users on Simula that
>> >>> are only interested in building the kernel.
>> >>>
>> >>> Any objections?
>> >>>
>> >>> /Anders
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
>> >>> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
>> >> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
>> >> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > DOLFIN-dev mailing list
>> > DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
>> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
>