dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Did we all agree on this?

    make modules
    make modules_install

/Anders


On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:45:34AM +0100, Johan Hoffman wrote:
> Sounds good. I say that we go with make modules etc. and that we make
> clear in documentation and welcoming message that the modules are needed
> for the demos to work (possibly returning a warning when trying to make
> demos without modules).
> 
> /Johan
> 
> 
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 09:58:26PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >> Sounds good. "make demo" won't necessarily work if the modules haven't
> been built though.
> >>
> >> An alternative if a configure flag --enable/disable-modules.
> >
> > That will have the same effect (not being able to build module demos).
> >
> > Perhaps we could have a flag make_module_demos, but maybe we should try
> to keep the number of targets down?
> >
> > /Anders
> >
> >
> >> Garth
> >>
> >> Anders Logg wrote:
> >> > I'm suggesting to add the following new make targets:
> >> >
> >> >     make modules
> >> >
> >> > and
> >> >
> >> >     make modules_install
> >> >
> >> > As it is now, compiling the modules takes a considerable time of the
> build process and we have quite a number of users on Simula that are
> only interested in building the kernel.
> >> >
> >> > Any objections?
> >> >
> >> > /Anders
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> >> > DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> >> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> > DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
> >
> 
> 
> 
>